Mail Archive Search: <+from:n2cu@buffnet.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:n2cu@buffnet.net: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Extended Double Zepp question (score: 1): Author: n2cu@buffnet.net (Thomas R. Williams); Date: Wed, 07 Oct 1998 21:24:53 -0700; Greetings, I was going to install EDZ's for 80 & 40m this coming week using the dimensions described in the ARRL handbook. All seemed to be going well until I read the July CQ article by VE3ERP. His; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00154.html (7,466 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Extended Double Zepp question (score: 1): Author: n2cu@buffnet.net (Thomas R. Williams); Date: Thu, 08 Oct 1998 10:10:31 -0400; Thanks for the replies. I should have mentioned that these will be monoband antennas, with the 450 Ohm ladder line connected to a balun at the 52 Ohm point, then coax running to the shack. No tuner i; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00174.html (7,426 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Re: The Best Antenna & GAP Verticals (score: 1): Author: n2cu@buffnet.net (Thomas R. Williams); Date: Thu, 08 Oct 1998 15:58:30 -0400; David, A GAP Challenger is the only antenna I've used since getting back on the air 13 months ago. I am very favorably impressed with it. Gets out great on 40m and 20m, OK on 10m, and so-so on 80m an; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00191.html (7,522 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Re: The Best Antenna & GAP Verticals (score: 1): Author: n2cu@buffnet.net (Thomas R. Williams); Date: Fri, 09 Oct 1998 07:04:04 -0700; David, The Titan is similar in function, just different size and bands (WARC included). For reviews check QST - Jan 1995 and CQ - Mar 1990 for the Challenger and Monitoring Times - Aug 1996 for the T; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00209.html (7,723 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] GAP Verticals with 75 Ohm CATV Cable and/or Balun (score: 1): Author: n2cu@buffnet.net (Thomas R. Williams); Date: Fri, 09 Oct 1998 17:55:33 -0700; David, I mailed out the reviews today. If you can't wait, you can view the QST review of the Challenger from the Members Only Product Review on the ARRL web site. BTW, I have no connections to GAP An; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00229.html (7,909 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Extended Double Zepp Problem (score: 1): Author: n2cu@buffnet.net (Thomas R. Williams); Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 10:12:14 -0700; Greetings, I have installed EDZ's for 80m and 40m at right angles on my tower at 40' using the formulas supplied by two sources (leg length = 630/f, 450 Ohm ladder line length = 135/f). Attaching an; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00495.html (8,552 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Extended Double Zepp Problem (score: 1): Author: n2cu@buffnet.net (Thomas R. Williams); Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 12:31:56 -0700; Fellow TowerTalkers, Thanks for the replies so far. My desired use is to have two, single band EDZ's so that I can change bands quickly without having to tune (plus I don't have a tuner). Maybe the A; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00502.html (8,030 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] Re: Extended Double Zepp Problem (score: 1): Author: n2cu@buffnet.net (Thomas R. Williams); Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 13:56:33 -0700; Hello again, Sorry for the bandwidth...but...I just added 16' to each leg of my 80m EDZ making it a total of 185' on each side. This calculates to 656/f; much longer than expected. The SWR at the end; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00506.html (8,112 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] Invisible Fence (score: 1): Author: n2cu@buffnet.net (Thomas R. Williams); Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 06:45:24 -0700; Fred, I don't have the answer to the first part of your question, but I DO have an invisible fence running around part of my property (approximately 1000' of wire). I detect no signals from it anywhe; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00757.html (7,774 bytes)
10. [TowerTalk] Hardware for TH6DXX (score: 1): Author: n2cu@buffnet.net (Thomas R. Williams); Date: Mon, 08 Jun 1998 07:44:19 -0400; Hello all, Does anyone know of a source for replacement hardware (screws, washers, nuts) for a TH6DXX. Hy-Gain has been totally unresponsive to my requests. 73, Tom N2CU -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.con; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00220.html (7,562 bytes)
11. [TowerTalk] Re: Hardware for TH6DXX (score: 1): Author: n2cu@buffnet.net (Thomas R. Williams); Date: Mon, 08 Jun 1998 12:41:16 -0400; All, Thank-you for the excellent response. This was my first use of the reflector. I must apologize to Hy-Gain for jumping the gun - I did not call them directly, but sent several E-mails. I now unde; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00227.html (7,055 bytes)
12. [TowerTalk] Re: Vertical? (score: 1): Author: n2cu@buffnet.net (Thomas R. Williams); Date: Fri, 12 Jun 1998 13:26:43 -0400; Steve, I've been using a GAP Challenger since September until I get my beam and wires up. I like it so much I'm going to keep it for use on 80m and 40m, and as a search antenna for the other bands. T; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00418.html (7,547 bytes)
13. [TowerTalk] Feedlines (score: 1): Author: n2cu@buffnet.net (Thomas R. Williams); Date: Mon, 15 Jun 1998 13:09:07 -0400; Greetings, All things considered, is Belden 9913F a reasonable choice for the 220' run from my house to the tower base and remote switch? The tower will have a tribander, and wires for 40, 80, 160. N; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00532.html (7,315 bytes)
14. [TowerTalk] city council horror (score: 1): Author: n2cu@buffnet.net (Thomas R. Williams); Date: Wed, 24 Jun 1998 13:01:50 -0400; Gentlemen, It's very easy for one to say that you should stand up for your rights, but I agree with Steve - they hold the ropes! If you have ever been involved in a situation like this you would know; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00863.html (9,157 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]