Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n2tk@idsi.net: 40 ]

Total 40 documents matching your query.

21. [CQ-Contest] RE: [TowerTalk] 22VAC to 2 110VAC circuits (score: 1)
Author: n2tk@idsi.net (Tony Kazmakites)
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 10:19:16 -0500
I have to disagree with you. Standard 2 conductor plus ground Romex has a black, white and bare wire. The black is hot, the white is neutral and the bare is ground, when hooked up as a 110v line. Whe
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00448.html (8,779 bytes)

22. Re[CQ Contest}RE: [TowerTalk] 22VAC to 2 110VAC circuits (score: 1)
Author: n2tk@idsi.net (Tony Kazmakites)
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 10:19:29 -0500
I disagree. Some breakers are made to either add the bar to make them 2 pole or to remove a bar to make them two single pole breakers. I would like to see in the NEC where you need 3 wire plus ground
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00449.html (9,555 bytes)

23. [TowerTalk] Cushcraft parts help vs new Force 12 warc antenna (score: 1)
Author: n2tk@idsi.net (Tony Kazmakites)
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 1999 19:25:54 -0500
A few months ago I filled out the paperwork on Cushcraft's web site for parts info. No answer yet. Thursday afternoon I faxed a request for pricing and delivery for traps for my A3WS. Maybe I will he
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00130.html (8,335 bytes)

24. [TowerTalk] HAPPY 99 (score: 1)
Author: n2tk@idsi.net (Tony Kazmakites)
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 15:37:47 -0500
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0001_01BE5A8B.786520C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Unfortunately I opened it. I see th
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00394.html (13,842 bytes)

25. [TowerTalk] RE:[Tower-Talk]A SAD Precedent? (score: 1)
Author: n2tk@idsi.net (Tony Kazmakites)
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 06:15:04 -0500
I was asked to pull a message on this reflector that had to do with 160-10m receiver preamps because it was not in line with what this reflector is about. When I see several messages like the one bel
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00491.html (9,493 bytes)

26. [TowerTalk] Receiver Preamps (Was sad precedent) (score: 1)
Author: n2tk@idsi.net (Tony Kazmakites)
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 12:40:16 -0500
Hi Lyn, I am using an Ameco PCL-P nuvistor preamp. It works fine. I also have a Palomar P-310X preamp. Not very happy with it. Lots of noise gain, but not as much signal gain. I replaced the fet with
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00508.html (8,238 bytes)

27. [TowerTalk] Small 160 M receiving Antennas (score: 1)
Author: n2tk@idsi.net (N2TK)
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1999 21:26:35 -0500
Don't have much property here either. The longest beverages I could fit ranged from 220' to 310'. Definitely not long enough. Over a season I compared these beverages to ewes. The ewes were 15' high
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00059.html (11,228 bytes)

28. [TowerTalk] FW: 160M Small Antennas (score: 1)
Author: n2tk@idsi.net (N2TK)
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 07:41:56 -0500
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0003_01BE3A13.D907A8A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Tony Saw your post on Tower Talk (I
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00126.html (19,391 bytes)

29. [TowerTalk] HF Preamps (score: 1)
Author: n2tk@idsi.net (Tony Kazmakites)
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 10:19:54 -0500
I am still using an Ameco PCL-P nuvistor preamp. Also have a Palomar P-310X preamp. After changing the fet with a SK3050 and adding a ferrite bead on the gate, it became more useable. Now it is almos
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00471.html (7,137 bytes)

30. [TowerTalk] EWE vs K9AY LOOP (score: 1)
Author: n2tk@idsi.net (Tony Kazmakites)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 13:34:18 -0500
Hi Stew. Here is what I did. I have 3 ewes that are 15' high X 38' long. I feed each end with a box at each end that houses a relay, terminating resistor and a 9:1 transformer. I feed 12v through the
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00520.html (10,010 bytes)

31. [TowerTalk] FW: Help - 80m 4 square (score: 1)
Author: n2tk@idsi.net (N2TK)
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1998 19:33:59 -0500
Presently I have a 4 square based on the article in section 6.3 of ON4UN's Low Band Dxing, 2nd edition. I have 4 posts with a vertical wire from each pulled up to the top of the 80' tower. I am using
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00311.html (9,432 bytes)

32. FW: [TowerTalk] FW: Help - 80m 4 square (score: 1)
Author: n2tk@idsi.net (N2TK)
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1998 12:28:37 -0500
If you want more gain, ADD MORE RADIALS ! de Tom N4KG ___________________________________________________________________ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get comple
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00370.html (8,313 bytes)

33. FW: [TowerTalk] FW: Help - 80m 4 square (score: 1)
Author: n2tk@idsi.net (N2TK)
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1998 12:29:16 -0500
Tony, Only one radial per vertical is killing your gain. You should have at least four radials per vertical if in a ground plane configuration. if ground mounted then mo' wire = mo' better--just do n
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00371.html (11,063 bytes)

34. FW: [TowerTalk] FW: Help - 80m 4 square (score: 1)
Author: n2tk@idsi.net (N2TK)
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1998 12:29:44 -0500
Hi Tony, AV80 I'd bet money your Cushcraft vertical, using only four radials, is several dB weaker than it could be with a good ground system. It is not surprising the 4 square only has about the sam
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00372.html (10,802 bytes)

35. FW: [TowerTalk] FW: Help - 80m 4 square (score: 1)
Author: n2tk@idsi.net (N2TK)
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1998 12:30:02 -0500
Tony, I am using the same antenna here. I have had confidence that this one seems to be working. I say "seems" because the only thing I have to compare it too is a 1/4 wave sloper and comparisons wit
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00373.html (12,241 bytes)

36. [TowerTalk] FW: Help = 80M 4 square (score: 1)
Author: n2tk@idsi.net (N2TK)
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1998 12:30:53 -0500
I have a four square with Tee tops off my 108 ft tower on 80. I currently have 6 elevated radials on each. at one point I had one on each, similar to yours. while it made it nice to tune the antenna
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00374.html (7,876 bytes)

37. FW: [TowerTalk] FW: Help - 80m 4 square (score: 1)
Author: n2tk@idsi.net (N2TK)
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1998 12:31:44 -0500
Hello fellow 80 M 4 SQ. user, Will describe mine and give you some performance numbers. I was considering changing over to something you are describing, but after speaking with Jack, W1WEF who has do
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00375.html (12,800 bytes)

38. [TowerTalk] FW: Help - 80m 4 square (score: 1)
Author: n2tk@idsi.net (N2TK)
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1998 12:32:36 -0500
Tony; Ur post forwarded to us. For starters; without modeling, it sounds as i fthe verticals are coupling to the tower at 80'; a bit too low for connection. We suggest the Tee Top Vertical config: cu
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00376.html (11,270 bytes)

39. [TowerTalk] FW: Help 80m 4 square (score: 1)
Author: n2tk@idsi.net (N2TK)
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1998 22:12:21 -0500
You don't have anywhere near enough radials. . . . . . . . . ___________________________________________________________________ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00386.html (7,563 bytes)

40. [TowerTalk] 40-2cd questions (score: 1)
Author: n2tk@idsi.net (N2TK)
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 12:18:04 -0500
I will be tilting over the tower to replace the boom with a 2" x .125" x 24' piece of aluminum tubing. This will add a few more feet separation as I won't be using the strut anymore. This has seemed
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00481.html (7,561 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu