Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n3ox@n3ox.net: 305 ]

Total 305 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [TowerTalk] Large Loop Antenna - Electrostatically Shield Loops (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:11:13 -0400
I don't think it's an issue that is worrisome with a large transmitting loop. The useful property of small loops is that they have a very clean pattern with very deep nulls. Any loop response to com
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-04/msg00521.html (9,186 bytes)

82. Re: [TowerTalk] Working on High Voltage Lines (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:33:39 -0400
It's AC, so the rod thing is just to control the breakdown of the line-to-(lineman+helicopter) side of a capacitive voltage divider (the other side is helicopter-to-world capacitance) ... that thing
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-04/msg00556.html (7,319 bytes)

83. Re: [TowerTalk] Hardwired coax (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:32:45 -0400
Could be something incidental to the repair, like a shield strand across the coax or water ingress? Was the feedline mechanically damaged? I wonder if a connector got pulled hard somewhere? I can sa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-04/msg00612.html (7,761 bytes)

84. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: RF choke woes?? (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 17:08:56 -0400
Where were you standing relative to the antenna when you tested it? Where does the coax run relative to the antenna? Anything that gets anywhere near the T-wires will have a major detuning effect. D
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00077.html (7,029 bytes)

85. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower in Tree (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 11:33:48 -0400
No kidding! I just looked it up on Matweb.com and the flexural yield strength is listed at 8100psi! The elastic modulus is about a thirtieth that of steel (1000ksi vs. 30,000ksi) , but the cross sec
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00114.html (7,649 bytes)

86. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower in Tree...bad feelings.. (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 13:46:39 -0400
Which is why any "weird" endeavor such as this should be approached from a sound, rational engineering perspective, informed, of course, by the voice of experience. I don't think that it's necessari
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00118.html (9,070 bytes)

87. Re: [TowerTalk] C31XR versus SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 11:32:00 -0400
As an outside observer on this one: There haven't been any attacks on SteppIR antennas; there have been dissenting opinions that SteppIRs are perfect and attempts to convince the dissenters that the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00164.html (8,869 bytes)

88. Re: [TowerTalk] C31XR versus SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 14:09:29 -0400
Look, I like complexity. I use motorized switched matching networks on my antennas so I don't have to use a regular tuner... The issue that I would be considering with something like a SteppIR is mor
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00181.html (8,874 bytes)

89. Re: [TowerTalk] Got a tower/antenna in a CC&R subdivision? (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 10:46:38 -0400
Because that will give people yet another thing to incorrectly blame a ham antenna for. When the market tanks, they'll just say "It's because of that eyesore" and demand their money. Someone on eHam
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00315.html (7,858 bytes)

90. Re: [TowerTalk] Got a tower/antenna in a CC&R subdivision? (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 11:23:52 -0400
No, but a promise signed with money is not an acceptable solution for your word. Actual data on the subject is what Krish needed and there are several good posts in that vein, so I'm going to bow ou
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00322.html (10,698 bytes)

91. Re: [TowerTalk] Got a tower/antenna in a CC&R subdivision? (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 11:53:45 -0400
Steve, thanks for chiming in... I hadn't thought about that, though it seems that Krish's HOA is considering allowing this installation even though they could likely outvote him and reject it out of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00332.html (11,396 bytes)

92. Re: [TowerTalk] Taking up slack in wire antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 10:02:17 -0400
I've thought about this a bit for guy ropes for my 60 foot telescoping vertical... they always seem to get tangled if it's even a little windy when I take it down: I haven't tried it yet, but I was
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00455.html (8,182 bytes)

93. Re: [TowerTalk] Taking up slack in wire antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 17:01:47 -0400
This one would take some serious geometrical wrangling to get the whole thing right, but I think you could potentially use the spools I mentioned before at the top of the bottom section of your crank
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00468.html (8,129 bytes)

94. Re: [TowerTalk] Driving ground rods in rocky soil (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 17:12:32 -0400
For RF grounding, radials are always better than a ground rod, so just cut it off where it is and add a couple more radials than you would have otherwise, and you're good to go. Dan ________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00531.html (8,076 bytes)

95. Re: [TowerTalk] Is anyone using the 3 feedline approach on theC31XRfor SO2R? (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 11:18:36 -0400
If you modeled this, did you include loads in the centers of the elements that go to other radios that model the effect of the feedlines terminated in the stubs and bandpass filters for the other rad
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00077.html (8,861 bytes)

96. [TowerTalk] Big vacuum variables.. (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 11:38:23 -0400
A little next-door to the topic at hand, but I'll use them in antennas if they're still good, I promise. I have a couple of Jensen 3kV vacuum variables that may have been shocked pretty hard by a fal
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00080.html (7,473 bytes)

97. Re: [TowerTalk] more on elevated radials (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 13:21:58 -0400
ground type Yes, it can. EZNEC+ allows more segments, and I think, circular polarization... but both EZNEC 4.0 and EZNEC+ 4.0 allow the Real, High Accuracy (also called, I think, Sommerfield-Norton)
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00140.html (7,307 bytes)

98. Re: [TowerTalk] elevated radials vertical (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2007 23:24:29 -0400
Once your antennas are working as well as they can, how much of getting through the pileup or winning the contest is the confidence you get from feeling good about them ? ;-) Dan ___________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00175.html (9,122 bytes)

99. Re: [TowerTalk] elevated radials vertical (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 09:06:46 -0400
On 40m, this antenna would need to be up at 40 feet and on 80m, 80 feet to get the same sort of interaction with the earth that that antenna had. That's not even considering the possibility of diffe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00242.html (9,558 bytes)

100. Re: [TowerTalk] step away from steppir, Son (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:41:34 -0400
"This is a ridiculous claim. How can it be noticeably better than a 4el 10m yagi on a 16' boom or a 3 el 20m yagi (like a Hy-Gain 203BA) on a 16' boom?" Noticeably? I dunno. However, it could be bett
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00381.html (8,053 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu