Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n3pkc@hotmail.com: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] BX64 (score: 1)
Author: "N3PKC" <n3pkc@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 00:25:09 -0400
Hello all, I have a Rohn tower, what appears a BX64, except it has heavy stainless steel bands around the tops of each section. It appears to be factory. It has a tilt-over concrete base , and also b
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00086.html (6,504 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] BX64 with Braces? (score: 1)
Author: "N3PKC" <n3pkc@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 13:02:34 -0400
I have two other Rohn BX towers that look like these, but they don't have the big steel bands where the sections meet. Any idea which version this might be? I'll get some pictures on here by the week
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00102.html (6,675 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] mystery antenna (score: 1)
Author: "N3PKC" <n3pkc@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 23:47:31 -0400
Well here it is http://www.personal.psu.edu/jhj5012/mysterytower.html Joe N3PKC The information contained in (and attached to) this e-mail is intended only for the personal and confidential use of th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00136.html (6,988 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] Mystery BX (score: 1)
Author: "N3PKC" <n3pkc@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 00:03:38 -0400
My point is that I have two BX towers in the air right now and none of them are like these, most notably the braces at top and bottom. Is this just a HBX or HDBX? The documentation didn't look like i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00137.html (6,556 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] bx (score: 1)
Author: "N3PKC" <n3pkc@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 03:03:29 -0400
http://www.personal.psu.edu/jhj5012/mysterytower.html Mike thanks for taking the time to reply. After being pretty convinced they weren't for shipping purposes only, further examination o my own phot
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00140.html (7,187 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] Busy day in Long Pond PA (score: 1)
Author: "N3PKC" <n3pkc@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 00:08:29 -0400
Guy wires are finished and there's not much more to do. The weather today was beautiful for the tower and the race. Rich, KB3MSJ is at about 1900ft asl in the Pocono Mountains of northeast PA. The te
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00198.html (7,322 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] Rohn BX32 (score: 1)
Author: "N3PKC" <n3pkc@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 21:44:30 -0400
Hello all, I got my little BX32 bolted together today. This is the second time I put this tower up and I'm hoping this will be its permanent home. It's right next to the new ham shack I built over th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00270.html (7,099 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] 45g base and guy anchors (score: 1)
Author: "N3PKC" <n3pkc@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 15:48:21 -0400
I'm getting around to my Rohn 45g project, my first time working with the stuff. I decided on a 140' tower. This is shown with 3/16" EHS guys at 45' & 85', and 1/4" EHS at 125', all positioned 120 de
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00395.html (7,967 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] 45g Documentation (score: 1)
Author: "N3PKC" <n3pkc@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 15:49:21 -0400
BTW, Here's what I've been going by for 45g data. http://www.who-sells-it.com/images/catalogs/626/pdf_176.pdf Joe N3PKC _______________________________________________ _______________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00396.html (6,353 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 45g on 45TG base (score: 1)
Author: "N3PKC" <n3pkc@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:53:13 -0400
Steve K7LXC, thanks for the information. I found several places ideal for the tower where the ground is solid rock capable of supporting the tower base. The integrity of the rock at the ground level
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00582.html (10,126 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR400-PL259s (score: 1)
Author: "N3PKC" <n3pkc@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 13:03:33 -0400
There's problems with using standard or run of the mill PL-259's on newer 9913 and LMR400 because the center conducter is much larger in diameter than the old RG-8U or 213 they were usually intended
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00115.html (10,771 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR400-PL259s (score: 1)
Author: "N3PKC" <n3pkc@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 13:19:49 -0400
True, that's the source of the problem, so many differences in the PL-259's. Regardless of what is considered spec, I've seen as many different variations of the PL-259 as I've seen brands and manufa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00118.html (13,881 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu