Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n3rr@erols.com: 351 ]

Total 351 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Ua.indexOf( (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (n3rr)
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2003 11:44:34 -0500
-- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts -- multipart/alternative text/html audio/x-wav -- StripMime Errors -- A message with no text/plain section was received. The entire body of the message was
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00092.html (6,405 bytes)

2. [Towertalk] Ham M slippage? (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider (N3RR))
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 22:50:14 -0500
George, Yes, you have correctly posted a thread to the reflector, though I don't see any other responses to your posting yet. Regarding the Ham M, are you sure the rotor was slipping and the antenna
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00820.html (8,566 bytes)

3. [Towertalk] Towertalk Huh?!? (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider)
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 18:57:23 -0500
Go to my website and take a look: www.erols.com/n3rr Bill, N3RR
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00159.html (10,001 bytes)

4. [Towertalk] Stacking 205 Hy Gains (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider (N3RR))
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 08:49:57 -0500
Jeff, A good start is my website: www.erols.com/n3rr There's much more to learn, but take a look at my 205s and the gain curves I have on my website. Also, we'll need more info about where the lower
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00169.html (8,297 bytes)

5. [Towertalk] tower joint condition (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider)
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 23:36:05 -0500
This is not recommended by all literature I've seen. The inductance of such a run of copper (or other conductor) will do nothing to prevent/stop/ground the lightning. Bill, N3RR
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00585.html (7,139 bytes)

6. [Towertalk] AB-105 Assembly. Was: I gotta say "Uncle" (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider)
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 20:41:26 -0500
The horizontals are *very* important. As far as climbing steps, horizontals are nice to have, but they are *required* at the splice plates and at any location where there is an antenna side-mount or
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00699.html (9,433 bytes)

7. [Towertalk] N3RR Website (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider (N3RR))
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 21:12:51 -0400
TTs: As a result of Saturday's ARRL Web-article about my tower, many of you have requested the costs for my "Dream Tower". Well, I just uploaded a new page with *all* of the costs! Don't show this ne
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00460.html (6,426 bytes)

8. [Towertalk] Re: N3RR Website (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider (N3RR))
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 21:15:43 -0400
The site is: www.erols.com/n3rr Bill, N3RR
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00461.html (6,155 bytes)

9. [Towertalk] N3RR tower (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider (N3RR))
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 22:09:39 -0400
As a result of Saturday's ARRL Web-article about my tower, many of you have requested the costs for my "Dream Tower". Well, I just uploaded a new page with *all* of the costs! Don't show this new web
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00462.html (6,437 bytes)

10. [Towertalk] which box to use ? (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider (N3RR))
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 15:05:02 -0400
It's a no-brainer: Metal - and steel at that. Aluminum will not do the following: With steel, you get the benefit of Faraday shield that you will not get with plastic or with aluminum. All cables (co
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00067.html (9,416 bytes)

11. [Towertalk] which box to use ? (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider (N3RR))
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 23:45:22 -0400
Yes, I wrote the sentence to fast. I left out the info about magnetic field for aluminum. Yes, metal will have the Faraday shield, but aluminum will not stop magnetic fields. Therefore, steel is the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00092.html (8,139 bytes)

12. [Towertalk] Need VHF/UHF Antenna Advice (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider (N3RR))
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 09:08:53 -0400
Ed, Per the W3LPL cable attenuation tables on my website linked from: http://users.erols.com/n3rr/Cable/index.htm, at 1296 MHz the attenuation of 165 feet of LDF5-50A cable would be 2.5 dB. At 440 it
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00182.html (9,453 bytes)

13. [Towertalk] tower removal (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider (N3RR))
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 22:48:14 -0400
If you wish to re-use or sell the tower, that's not the way to do it. Likely, the tower will buckle without expert crane operation and experienced crew, especially since your post implies the crane l
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00468.html (9,604 bytes)

14. [Towertalk] creating ground "surround" of house: Obstacle (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider (N3RR))
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 00:56:10 -0400
Good questions, John! These are typical situations many hams encounter when designing and implementing a good lightning protection system. Let me address your questions in the order you posed them: b
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00566.html (11,713 bytes)

15. [Towertalk] creating ground "surround" of house: Obstacle (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider)
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 22:36:20 -0400
I totally agree Glenn and was about to reply to Jon's response with a similar answer, except I saw your comments and yours are right on. On another point: I disagree with the theory of disconnecting
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00640.html (16,709 bytes)

16. [Towertalk] creating ground "surround" of house: Obstacle (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider (N3RR))
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 23:51:47 -0400
Jon, Generally, most large acreage ham stations do not tie everything together. That's why you hear that these stations frequently get lightning hits that wipe out equipment. Now to your other point:
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00643.html (23,382 bytes)

17. [Towertalk] More Grounding Answers (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider (N3RR))
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 15:21:55 -0400
My previous post answers a couple of the questions. To the question of where the lightning protection devices should be located, at, but not in, the house at the SPG is the best location. But, if tha
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00664.html (10,034 bytes)

18. [Towertalk] Box forSPG and Lightning protectors (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider (N3RR))
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 15:23:58 -0400
As I read some of the comments/questions about covering the lightning protection boxes, I'm wondering if consideration was taken into account for a Single Point Ground (SPG)?? If the lightning protec
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00666.html (8,831 bytes)

19. [Towertalk] Box forSPG and Lightning protectors (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider (N3RR))
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 21:47:32 -0400
Guy has it right. I couldn't have said it better. And my shack has all of what Guy says here. The SPG in the shack is a consolidation point (panel) for all of the equipment grounds in the shack and c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00707.html (21,461 bytes)

20. [Towertalk] Box forSPG and Lightning protectors (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider (N3RR))
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 22:39:31 -0400
Let's take this one item at a time: Phone lines (TELCO) come into the house from the outside (either above or below ground). Most, if not all, codes require TELCOs to provide lightning protection on
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00710.html (12,010 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu