Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n4zr@contesting.com: 1902 ]

Total 1902 documents matching your query.

281. [Towertalk] J. Martin Systems (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2002 22:08:30 -0400
That product was absurdly expensive. I suggest instead you look at 3/4" or 1" copper tubing. A few feet is just a few dollars, and you can run any sort of tapping screws into it you want.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00264.html (7,819 bytes)

282. [Towertalk] Inquiry - Tower Collapse/Fall/Radius Zone (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2002 15:32:34 -0400
I've said this before on towertalk, but it seems to me that one tradeoff might be to permit a setback smaller than the guyed tower height IF the guying scheme uses more than one guy anchor per direct
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00288.html (10,160 bytes)

283. [Towertalk] Inquiry - Tower Collapse/Fall/Radius Zone (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2002 15:46:14 -0400
Trees are "grandfathered". Like structures, if they were there before the zoning laws were put in, they get to stay ;^} 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the World HF Contest Station Database at www.pvrc.org
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00289.html (9,180 bytes)

284. [Towertalk] Guy Grip Question (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 21:51:53 -0400
Rohn isn't necessarily the last word on guy grips, of course, not like PLP. However, I was told (with straight face, I think), that water sliding down guy wires and freezing inside the ends of guy g
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00334.html (9,092 bytes)

285. [Towertalk] Any glaring discrepancies? (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 15:57:57 -0400
I think this spacing may turn out to be too close, particularly between the A3WS and the TH-7. I think this is asking a bit too much of the Ham IV. A Tailtwister would be a stronger choice. Wouldn't
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00421.html (11,005 bytes)

286. [Towertalk] Yaesu Rotors -- Should I?? (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 17:34:59 -0400
Glenn, I would not hesitate. My Yaesus have been bullet-proof. I have a G-1000SDX turning a C-3E and a 2-el shorty forty, and a G-800SA turning another C-3E on a sidemount. The only issue in 5 years
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00428.html (8,196 bytes)

287. [Towertalk] Why capacity hats on 40-2CD (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 07:26:12 -0400
The subject line almost says it all. This question originated because a friend and I were speculating about replacing the linear loading on a Force 12 EF-240S with lumped inductance, placed at the sa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00484.html (7,211 bytes)

288. [Towertalk] 620/340 (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 09:19:13 -0400
Steve and I have agreed to disagree on the need for additional rivets. I have not had anything even approaching an element rivet failure in 5 years with 3 force12 antennas. In my limited experience,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00487.html (8,496 bytes)

289. [Towertalk] Yaesu Rotors -- Should I?? (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 10:09:58 -0400
Judging by the schematic in the new G-800SA manual, they totally changed it, and reduced the part count by about 2/3, which has to be a step forward in reliability. It works differently now -- for ex
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00528.html (8,107 bytes)

290. [Towertalk] modeling info (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 21:08:11 -0400
ARRL invited manufacturers to include gain and pattern claims in their ads, if they would supply NEC-4 modeling data to substantiate them. Nobody did. 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the World HF Contest Sta
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00561.html (7,535 bytes)

291. [Towertalk] modeling info (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 22:51:47 -0400
Tom Frenaye points out that M2 did submit modeling data for some of their antennas, and were allowed to run gain figures in their ads. He's right, and I apologize for being over-categorical. I found
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00565.html (7,566 bytes)

292. [Towertalk] Mixing EHS and Phillystran (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 21:21:15 -0400
I don't recall that. I was advised that 1/4 wave was minimal and reported anecdotally that when I went from 21 feet of nonconductive guy to my entire top guy being Philly, my 40m yagi on top seemed t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00619.html (7,468 bytes)

293. [Towertalk] driving ground rods (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 06:31:53 -0400
I think it's the "sliding" part that is fooling you. The classic fence post driver is a steel tube about 2 feet long with handles near the top end and a plate plug welded inside that end. It's quite
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00682.html (9,202 bytes)

294. [Towertalk] ABC Home Owners Assoc Expose (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 14:22:01 -0400
Maybe I'm being over-optimistic, but it seems to me that the strong trend in state legislatures toward adding PRB-1 type "reasonable accommodation" language to state codes, plus the precedent of the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00805.html (9,938 bytes)

295. [Towertalk] ABC Home Owners Assoc Expose (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 21:22:20 -0400
Has this thread maybe, just maybe, run past the point of diminishing returns? 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the World HF Contest Station Database at www.pvrc.org
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00841.html (9,632 bytes)

296. [Towertalk] Tower Height Regulations (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 12:43:07 -0400
Well, Jefferson County, West Virginia's Planning and Zoning Commission has formally categorized amateur radio towers and antennas as Essential Utility Equipment, thereby exempting them from regulatio
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00875.html (11,296 bytes)

297. [Towertalk] OCF Longwire with moveable feed point (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 22:18:57 -0400
I just modeled a 3.5 WL wire 1/2 WL above ground, fed in the center, at each end, and at 25 percent of the length from one end. The patterns are almost the same, regardless of the feedpoint location.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00919.html (8,698 bytes)

298. [Towertalk] Buying nuts and bolts [was "Mosley"] (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:59:16 -0400
Another option worth considering is the local farm supply store, like Southern States. They have galvanized hardware priced *by the pound* (literally), cotter pins, etc. Not the place for buying Grad
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00981.html (8,911 bytes)

299. [Towertalk] Deed restrictions - It's about camels and frogs (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 08:08:42 -0400
I was glad to see K4IA's message, which added some useful perspective to a pretty light-weight thread, but this last paragraph kind of threw me. I don't think anyone should have been surprised that t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg01014.html (9,264 bytes)

300. [Towertalk] Explain this! (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:03:35 -0400
I think K1MK may have been closest to the mark with the mention of St. Elmo's Fire. I found the following explanation on the Scientific American web site. Elsewhere, I think I have also read that it
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg01018.html (10,811 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu