- 21. [TowerTalk] vertical-tower interaction (score: 1)
- Author: "Rudy Severns" <n6lf@arrl.net>
- Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 08:46:02 -0700
- I guess I don't understand why realizing you may have a problem equates to giving up. In many situations you may very well just have to live with the problem but it doesn't hurt realize that your sig
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00293.html (6,926 bytes)
- 22. [TowerTalk] tower decoupling (score: 1)
- Author: "Rudy Severns" <n6lf@arrl.net>
- Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 09:19:49 -0700
- Hi Dan, I have set up a vertical and a 25G tower in my pasture for a series of experiments to answer just the kind of questions you asked plus a number of others relating to tower-vertical coupling a
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00351.html (7,137 bytes)
- 23. Re: [TowerTalk] Insulated Rohn 25 (score: 1)
- Author: "Rudy Severns" <n6lf@arrl.net>
- Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 10:23:12 -0700
- Hello All, Since a number of you expressed an interest, I have loaded a description of my clamp-on current transformer to my web site, www.antennasbyn6lf.com . I want to thank everyone for their kind
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00400.html (8,596 bytes)
- 24. [TowerTalk] tower-array coupling example (score: 1)
- Author: "Rudy Severns" <n6lf@arrl.net>
- Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 10:40:51 -0700
- Some of you may be wondering why I've become such a nut case on tower-array coupling. Last fall I made some detailed measurements on an 80m 4-square with tower interaction problems. I've written up a
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00401.html (7,168 bytes)
- 25. [TowerTalk] Power poles (score: 1)
- Author: "Rudy Severns" <n6lf@arrl.net>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 08:45:42 -0700
- If you live in an area where logging is common then transporting and erecting small power poles (up to 60' or so) is very straight forward. You just hire a self-loading logging truck which are very c
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00075.html (6,722 bytes)
- 26. [TowerTalk] using power poles (score: 1)
- Author: "Rudy Severns" <n6lf@arrl.net>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 14:47:22 -0700
- I have used quite a few power poles at my QTH, up to 95' but they were a last resort. I have a situation where the antennas are located on a very narrow ridge with no way to use guyed towers. I have
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00086.html (7,904 bytes)
- 27. [TowerTalk] utility poles with steps (score: 1)
- Author: "Rudy Severns" <n6lf@arrl.net>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 08:14:53 -0700
- Many years ago (at least 40) I had a pole installed but before erecting it, I installed the galvanized steel screw-in steps which used to be common. I could then climb the pole without spurs or a buc
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00112.html (7,419 bytes)
- 28. [TowerTalk] abreviated radial systems (score: 1)
- Author: "Rudy Severns" <n6lf@arrl.net>
- Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 11:48:25 -0700
- I have recently completed a series of tests comparing the signal strength between a 40m vertical with 32, 1/4-wave, radials in a complete circle to the same vertical with a sector missing from the ra
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00496.html (7,824 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu