Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n7cl@mmsi.com: 182 ]

Total 182 documents matching your query.

41. [TowerTalk] Ground Radial Fields (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 1999 12:40:32 -0700
Hi Tom, I think we are in agreement here. But as I read your post exactly what you meant was unclear to me (and probably to others). I think you said (and meant) that compared to a sufficiently dense
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00061.html (9,180 bytes)

42. [TowerTalk] Re: Guy wire interaction (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 09:29:52 -0700
Hi Tom, To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Snip... The load reactances will be evaluated at whatever frequency you run the model. A frequency rescale will not rescale the load network component values. H
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00190.html (8,889 bytes)

43. [TowerTalk] Re: Guy wire interaction (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 10:53:11 -0700
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Right you are Clive! I had just assumed that Tom would enter guy wire diameters in inches rather than as AWG numbers. So, what is the AWG number for 5/16" EHS guy wire
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00221.html (8,047 bytes)

44. [TowerTalk] Electric Wench Source? (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 14:06:19 -0700
Hi Bill, I have been looking for one of these for a long time too. It only seems fair. After all the women have had the functional equivalent of this device for other sex for a long time now. But why
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00228.html (8,490 bytes)

45. [TowerTalk] Balun(s) Testing (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 15:47:20 -0700
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Does the ARRL book really recommend a 4:1 balun with a hairpin match? I'd expect this to be a 1:1 balun. Yes. Can't say. Its a possibility. But... Have you tried them w
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00269.html (9,522 bytes)

46. [TowerTalk] MFJ tunable loop antennas (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 14:29:51 -0700
Hi Lane, I have one of the MFJ 1796 loops. I have also been involved in debugging several other local ham's problems with small loop antennas in this area. Most of the problems were with AEA Isoloops
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00271.html (8,124 bytes)

47. [TowerTalk] Guying questions (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 14:13:40 -0700
Hi Mike, Not to try to give any specific advice beyond "go seek out a PE", I just went through this exercise (using a PE) for elevated guying of 70 feet of Rohn 55 with a 30 sq foot wind load at the
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00272.html (8,681 bytes)

48. [TowerTalk] Lightning protection grounding (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 09:38:42 -0700
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> I'll bet you two nickels that little if any of the current flows on the support cable anyhow. The tower sections usually make good enough contact (judging by the lack
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00322.html (11,346 bytes)

49. [TowerTalk] Balun(s) Testing (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 17:34:26 -0700
<3711103B.A57E387A@access.webcombo.net> <199904112247.PAA25378@toontown.mmsi.com> <37126C6B.ED73BA96@access.webcombo.net> Sender: owner-towertalk@contesting.com Precedence: bulk X-List-Info: http://w
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00330.html (10,372 bytes)

50. [TowerTalk] Balun(s) Testing (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 11:28:20 -0700
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Snip... I read the antenna book entry for this antenna. They do indeed specify a 4:1 balun for feeding this thing. And, it is indeed _not_ a T-match or floded dipole el
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00348.html (9,789 bytes)

51. [TowerTalk] Ground Rods (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 10:23:00 -0700
Hi Bob, Bill, Last October I drilled in a field of ground electrodes in preparation for the tower I'll be putting up this spring. I also drove in a few the "old fashioned way" just to have a comparis
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00435.html (14,315 bytes)

52. [TowerTalk] Lightning protection grounding (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 11:07:25 -0700
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> You _can_ do that. But until the surface area of the ground wire and coax shield are larger than the surface area of the tower structure, the tower will still be carryi
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00438.html (12,118 bytes)

53. [TowerTalk] Lightning protection grounding (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 16:16:50 -0700
<3717319D.DFE23C18@erols.com> <199904161807.LAA17332@toontown.mmsi.com> <3717BA82.726BD29D@erols.com> Sender: owner-towertalk@contesting.com Precedence: bulk X-List-Info: http://www.contesting.com/to
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00448.html (13,927 bytes)

54. [TowerTalk] Lightning protection grounding (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 1999 13:03:39 -0700
<199904162316.QAA19069@toontown.mmsi.com> <3717D309.F63E80B8@erols.com> Sender: owner-towertalk@contesting.com Precedence: bulk X-List-Info: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html X-Sponsor: W4A
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00468.html (11,753 bytes)

55. [TowerTalk] Lightning protection grounding (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 1999 15:21:41 -0700
<199904162316.QAA19069@toontown.mmsi.com> <3717D309.F63E80B8@erols.com> <199904172003.NAA27024@toontown.mmsi.com> <3718FEBB.A65D62F2@erols.com> Sender: owner-towertalk@contesting.com Precedence: bulk
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00473.html (10,949 bytes)

56. [TowerTalk] cutting 5/16" and heavier EHS (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 1999 11:55:45 -0700
<3.0.32.19990424220158.00910290@bl-mail2.corpeast.baynetworks.com> Sender: owner-towertalk@contesting.com Precedence: bulk X-List-Info: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html X-Sponsor: W4AN, KM
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00607.html (11,193 bytes)

57. [TowerTalk] Best vs. Maxwell -- Again??( LONG !!) (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 18:21:22 -0700
Michael, I have read the article in question and as near as I can tell he is correct in his ultimate conclusions. I'll try to answer your questions in less than 12 pages of tortuous math to support a
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00339.html (10,741 bytes)

58. [TowerTalk] Best vs. Maxwell -- Again??( LONG !!) (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 14:39:17 -0700
Hi Jeff, OK. Here is the procedure to find the additional line loss caused by operating a transmission line into a load which does not perfectly match the line impedance. I have spread it out within
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00368.html (9,693 bytes)

59. [TowerTalk] Ground Rod Under Tower Base (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 11:02:04 -0700
Hi Ron, It seems to me that there is a LOT of confusion on this subject. To: <towertalk@contesting.com> You should not worry about stroke current heating an appropriately sized conductor (bigger than
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00390.html (11,993 bytes)

60. [TowerTalk] Orion rotator application note (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 13:40:42 -0700
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Snip... It is blue (service removable). -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: tower
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00425.html (8,839 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu