Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n7cl@mmsi.com: 182 ]

Total 182 documents matching your query.

61. [TowerTalk] Ground Radial Fields (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 11:11:15 -0700
Hi Clive, If this is your 40 meter antenna, it is already working pretty well. I'm assuming (since you didn't specify) that you are talking about the radial field surrounding the base of a full size
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00505.html (9,837 bytes)

62. [TowerTalk] Tri-Ex drawing update (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 08:13:10 -0700
We should probably get used to this from tower companies for the time being. They have more high profit margin commercial work than they can possibly do until all of the cell/PCS sites that will tole
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00065.html (8,181 bytes)

63. [TowerTalk] SGC-235 500 Watt Tuner (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 09:20:09 -0700
I had a very bad experience while trying to help a friend with his motor home mobile installation of an SGC tuner. basically, the problem is as folows: 1. If the tuner is set up, tuned to a fixed set
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00068.html (10,146 bytes)

64. [TowerTalk] SGC-235 500 Watt Tuner (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 09:53:36 -0700
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Snip... We did too for the first failure. Snip... This is also true of the IC736. But beyond this - after the first failure, we set the AM carrier power output limit t
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00100.html (10,726 bytes)

65. [TowerTalk] Tri-Ex drawing update (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 1999 08:30:14 -0700
Hi Joel, I wasn't trying to "tar" them all with the same brush so to speak. But I do think that for a time they will all be in the same class which is called "busy". Unfortunately for us, it is busy
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00126.html (9,330 bytes)

66. [TowerTalk] 50:75 ohm transformation (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 09:42:01 -0700
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Hi J.P., I think that analysis is a bit misleading. The matched loss per 100 ft. in 3/4 inch 75 ohm CATV line at 30 MHz is 0.35 dB. We have been discussing 200ish foot
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00222.html (11,141 bytes)

67. [TowerTalk] 50:75 ohm transformation (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 09:58:12 -0700
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> SNIP... OOPS! I mistyped a number. The change is not significant to the discusion but I'm sure there are those who will worry about it. The following insert from the pr
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00224.html (10,057 bytes)

68. [TowerTalk] (Long) -- ATR-30 and AT4K Antenna Tuners] (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 15:30:44 -0700
Jim, Don't bother reposting. I already have forwarded this reformatted text. Tabs are a bit iffy for email readers. 73, Eric N7CL -- Start of forwarded message -- From: "Jim Reid" <jreid@aloha.net> T
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00260.html (14,661 bytes)

69. [TowerTalk] Vertical Dipoles (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1999 12:24:04 -0700 (MST)
Hi Tom, Yes, I realize that _all_ of my comments apply specifically to the antenna I was describing and _only_ that antenna. They are not intended to be interpereted as "J-poles are generally wonderf
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00046.html (14,120 bytes)

70. [TowerTalk] Anti-Oxidant stuff - was Pencil marks (are BAD!)-was OX-Gard (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1999 14:18:23 -0700 (MST)
Hi Kurt, Congratulations on the new call. It is _way_ more cool than the old one ;-) To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Specifically regarding penetrox: There are several different products sold under th
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00050.html (13,583 bytes)

71. [TowerTalk] Anti-Oxidant stuff - was Pencil marks (are BAD!)-wasOX-Gard (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1999 11:38:25 -0700 (MST)
Hi Kurt, You have a good point. It would be useful to point out a source. The stuff is really not hard to get and $20 worth will last the average guy a lifetime. I've pointed out a source in my comen
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00064.html (11,309 bytes)

72. [TowerTalk] C4 Delivered on Kauai (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 10:47:44 -0700
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> I would like to add to this that you should be VERY careful about approaching lexan or any polycarbonate plastic with ANY volatile hydrocarbon solvent or paint/adhesiv
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00120.html (9,505 bytes)

73. [TowerTalk] 60' tower on top of 20 foot building (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 16:22:59 -0700
Hi Pete, Actually, the answer is a little of both. For mutual coupling to ground and what that does to element tuning and SWR, the antenna will think its at about 60 feet (assuming it is otherwise pr
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00134.html (8,105 bytes)

74. [TowerTalk] KLM 10-30 Log Perodic (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 10:42:56 -0700
Hi Steve, Sorry it took so long to bet back to this. Comments below. To: <towertalk@contesting.com> I'm not quite sure what you mean by "optimized" in this context. But judging by the results of your
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00161.html (10,738 bytes)

75. [TowerTalk] Schematic Drawing Program - Results (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 10:40:30 -0700
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Speaking as someone who has been through the learning curve for several of the expensive professional capture / layout packages, I would not consider the lack of a sym
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00233.html (8,904 bytes)

76. [TowerTalk] Pencil Marks (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 17:31:20 -0700
Hi Kurt, Mike, Well I asked the A&P guy. He said that there are certified markers that can be used. He said they looked to him just like Sharpies. So, since this applies to metal marking which we do
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00252.html (10,989 bytes)

77. [TowerTalk] loctite on ham-4 bolts? (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 14:57:44 -0700
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> There are several variants of Loctite and it is important to use the correct one for the application. Permanent Loctite (usually red for the range of thread diameters
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00491.html (8,848 bytes)

78. [TowerTalk] Tower grounds near Underground Utilities? (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 10:41:40 -0700
Hi Jonathan, The answer to your question about how much ground is required to dissipate a strike safely is: "It varies". The problem is that this requirement is profoundly affected by so many variabl
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00518.html (11,928 bytes)

79. Fwd: Re: [TowerTalk] Tower grounds near Underground Utilities? (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 16:03:26 -0700
Hi Bruce, Yes, the IEEE std is a good resource - one of the best. And I might as well take this opportunity to (one more time) point to a very exhaustive resource that includes references to all the
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00528.html (11,645 bytes)

80. [TowerTalk] Tower grounds near Underground Utilities? (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 09:36:54 -0700
Hi Dick, Here is one source of this two volume set: DOD Single Stock Point Commanding Officer Naval Publications and Forms Center 5801 Tabor Avenue Philadelphia, PA 19120 The DoDSSP Special Assistanc
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00547.html (10,269 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu