Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:paul@w8aef.com: 83 ]

Total 83 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TowerTalk] LM470 tower remote schematic (score: 1)
Author: <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 20:54:12 -0000
I have documentation on both the standard LM-470 remote and an after market remote control. I can email them to you as attachments if you want. de Paul, W8AEF ________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00069.html (8,065 bytes)

62. Re: [TowerTalk] Antennas for 6 meters (score: 1)
Author: <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 18:24:11 -0000
Every vhf M2 antenna I have modelled have excellent patterns. Don't have anything more than 5 elements by them but I highly recommend Mike's designs. de Paul, W8AEF __________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00117.html (7,336 bytes)

63. Re: [TowerTalk] Portable Phased Arrays! (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Playford" <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 22:26:41 -0700
You may want to consider parasitic feed. That could simplify phasing a bunch. And you may find that vertical dipoles are quicker to deploy (depending on the frequency) de Paul, W8AEF ________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00658.html (9,869 bytes)

64. Re: [TowerTalk] Portable Phased Arrays! (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Playford" <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 09:08:07 -0700
I have experience with 4 square phased arrays. Over a dozen so far. The advantage of parasitic feeding is simplicity. I erect the 4 elements with elevated radials in their calculated positions (.22 w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00660.html (10,375 bytes)

65. Re: [TowerTalk] weight and sq. ft antenna limits on rohn 25 and 45 (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Playford" <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:58:56 -0700
You are in inspiration to us 71 year olds <grin>. de Paul, W8AEF ZF2JI/ZF2TA FO8DX/FO8PLA 8Q7AA XZ0A VU7RG TX5C SNIP _______________________________________________ __________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00879.html (8,823 bytes)

66. Re: [TowerTalk] Balun For Dipole (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Playford" <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 11:41:11 -0700
I agree with: Bob - I'm not a balun expert, but would recommend you try the Palomar BA-8. I've been using them here. They seem to work and there are no delicate windings that might arc over under hig
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00034.html (8,500 bytes)

67. Re: [TowerTalk] Balun For Dipole (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Playford" <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 12:52:17 -0700
Is the BA-8 that much different than the BA-58's? The '58 does decouple the feed line from the vertical dipole arrays by my field observation, and that is why I use them. The routing on the feed line
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00045.html (8,555 bytes)

68. Re: [TowerTalk] EZNEC- needs improvement (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Playford" <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 14:23:11 -0700
Just for yucks, bring up W6ELprop and: insert 23 degrees as your Minimum Radiation Angle (Options - Prediction Parameters). Then run a prediction to a country maybe 10000 Km away. Look at the predict
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00058.html (9,510 bytes)

69. Re: [TowerTalk] EZNEC- needs improvement (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Playford" <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 18:56:45 -0700
My point is that according to EZNEC 3.0, a dipole at 1/2 wavelength above ground over salt water will have its major lobe at 30 degrees above the horizon and have a gain of 8.36 dBi. 15 degrees it ha
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00083.html (12,068 bytes)

70. Re: [TowerTalk] EZNEC- needs improvement (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Playford" <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:57:37 -0700
That should be "Obviously that IS true". In practice you will find in the vicinity of 8 dB loss per F layer hop. And what you have not done is play with W6EL Prop and see what the differences in F la
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00134.html (13,056 bytes)

71. Re: [TowerTalk] Co-ax and Rotor Control cables inside PVC? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Playford" <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:21:32 -0700
Thin wall PVC is good for about a year in the Arizona sun. de Paul, W8AEF ZF2JI/ZF2TA FO8DX/FO8PLA 8Q7AA XZ0A VU7RG TX5C _______________________________________________ ______________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00144.html (8,416 bytes)

72. Re: [TowerTalk] EZNEC- needs improvement (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Playford" <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:40:26 -0700
Antenna gain is one thing, path loss is another. As I recall Steve's question was 'why does EZNEC predict higher gain for a dipole than a vertical, but in practice I see the vertical outperforming my
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00147.html (11,608 bytes)

73. Re: [TowerTalk] polarization change (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Playford" <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:37:49 -0700
Too many antennas is like too much money - no such thing. de Paul, W8AEF ZF2JI/ZF2TA FO8DX/FO8PLA 8Q7AA XZ0A VU7RG TX5C _______________________________________________ _______________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00333.html (8,351 bytes)

74. Re: [TowerTalk] Hardline ? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Playford" <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:31:46 -0700
Be careful with cable company hardline. It is probably 75 ohms impedance and when you connect it to 50 ohm coax (RG-214) it will become a 1/4 wavelength impedance transformer and mess your antenna sy
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00555.html (8,539 bytes)

75. [TowerTalk] Fw: Hardline ? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Playford" <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:18:29 -0700
Yup. But figuring out the 1/4 wave, or odd multiple, frequency, is the trick. Oh, by the way, we have a short piece of 50 ohm coax on both ends of the 75 ohm hard line, plus a balun at the antenna en
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00568.html (7,620 bytes)

76. Re: [TowerTalk] RG11 75ohm and 4 square 80m (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Playford" <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:01:02 -0700
Very important when using elevated radials: they will affect the resonant frequency of the element. When I installed my 4 squares I first installed two wires in the form of a 1/2 wave dipole (fed at
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00595.html (11,851 bytes)

77. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn Tower/Hy-Gain HDR-300/400 Rotor questions (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Playford" <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 19:02:18 -0700
The HDR-400 rotor that I had required 110vac on the transformer secondary. de Paul, W8AEF _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mai
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-06/msg00115.html (7,434 bytes)

78. [TowerTalk] FS: U.S.Tower MA-770MDP 75' tubular tower (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Playford" <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 19:15:48 -0700
This is a U.S. Tower MA-770MDP 75' crank up tubular tower, with MAF 770 raising fixture and MARB-770 Rotor base. Includes limit switches. Power up and positive pull-down. Sorry, no controls but I do
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-06/msg00116.html (6,918 bytes)

79. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna switching board ? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Playford" <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:27:53 -0700
The idea of a patch panel sounds good to me. I thought I was being real smart when I positioned my operating desk 18" from the wall so I could have access to the cables. Should have been 24" <grin>.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-06/msg00140.html (7,697 bytes)

80. Re: [TowerTalk] Shack ground (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Playford" <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 18:43:55 -0700
How many hams does it take to identify a shack ground? Too many. Time for me to take another extended vacation from this reflector. de Paul, W8AEF -- _______________________________________________ _
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-06/msg00224.html (9,191 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu