Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:peter.voelpel@t-online.de: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] MonstIR Rotor/tower/polyrod question (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <peter.voelpel@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 00:50:43 +0200
Hi Jan Erik, Concerning the discussion on towertalk... I own 4 Prosistel PST2051 advertised for 2,5m&sup2; windload. Two of them got the same failure, the worm-bearing was pushed outside! That happen
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00545.html (7,380 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Amplifier Recommendation (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <peter.voelpel@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 15:23:45 +0200
I would keep the AL1200 and convert it to GS-35B if the 3CX1200A7 failes some day 73 Peter _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers",
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00428.html (7,262 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] 4-square over existing groundscreen (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <peter.voelpel@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 15:31:50 +0200
I am thinking of erecting a 4-square for 40m around my 80m vertical which uses 130 buried radials 15-20m long. Will that work if I connect the 40m verticals to the existing radial system? The other i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00429.html (7,139 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] 4-square over existing groundscreen (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <peter.voelpel@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 01:03:15 +0200
losses Thank you Tom and others who replied by mail, I think it might be a good idea that I, before starting with the 4-sq, to run some tests with a single vertical on 40 with the possible combinatio
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00528.html (8,212 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] 40 meter beam info thanks (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <peter.voelpel@t-online.de>
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 13:47:24 +0200
Dave, I should like to suggest that you have a look on the 40m beams manufactured by OH2U http://www.oh2u.com/finnishantenna/products.pdf Finland is well known for its rough climate and a couple of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00446.html (7,423 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] rotatable k9ay and more... (score: 1)
Author: "peter.voelpel" <peter.voelpel@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 23:40:05 +0100
Hi Frederico, check the reflector on Yahoo concerning details and/or use Google. I read some stuff concerning a modified switchable arrangement for 8 directions with the K9AY loop. With that there wi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00189.html (9,411 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna on high winds... (score: 1)
Author: "peter.voelpel" <peter.voelpel@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 15:37:47 +0200
It does not matter whether the boom is round or square, what counts is the projected surface of the boom depending on its diameter and if it is less then the surface of the elements or more. With suc
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00107.html (10,183 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] New Cushcraft XM240 Trouble (score: 1)
Author: "peter.voelpel" <peter.voelpel@t-online.de>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 19:40:07 +0200
With me it is the other way round. I am not interested what I find at the coax end in the shack, that usually fits the output network of the transmitter. What counts is the behaviour at the feed poin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00230.html (9,041 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] 160M Inverted Vee (score: 1)
Author: "peter.voelpel" <peter.voelpel@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 19:35:53 +0200
It is not the case that there is only a big lobe straight up. Over poor ground the maximum of the lobe will be lower. That lobe also extends down to perhaps 15&deg; depending on the ground. At 15&deg
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00447.html (9,399 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] TA-33 Classic Feed Model TAC-33K (score: 1)
Author: "peter.voelpel" <peter.voelpel@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:52:11 +0200
Hi Dave, That sounds more like a T-match 73 Peter Just received a new TA-33M with TAC-33K feed. I've never seen a driven element feed like this one. Its a clever implementation. Where the two ends of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00444.html (8,623 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] 40 meter vertical ant (score: 1)
Author: "peter.voelpel" <peter.voelpel@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:32:34 +0100
And its main advantage is 5-7db groundgain. With my dipol at 100&acute;and sloping ground I always outperform on transmit a guy with a 2L-quad@20m 150km away. 73 Peter I have modeled this scenario an
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00258.html (7,584 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Vert. 1/2 wave dipole vs Hori. 1/2 wave dipole? (score: 1)
Author: "peter.voelpel" <peter.voelpel@t-online.de>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 09:31:05 +0200
I did that comparison on 40m with dx stations only and it was a big difference. I used a L-tuner with my 1/4 80m vertical above 3km of radials 20-30m long and used an inverted-V dipol at 30m height,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00283.html (8,527 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Guying a self-supporter (score: 1)
Author: "peter.voelpel" <peter.voelpel@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 04:52:53 +0100
To be honest, I'm not sure what the question is either :-) Folks seem to be equating self support towers with crankups, and who knows what else... Just to clarify the question in my OWN addled brain
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00167.html (11,960 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Best mast location? (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <peter.voelpel@t-online.de>
Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 17:26:40 +0200
You donīt need a bearing then, just a plate from water resistant hard wood drilled or cut out just for the mast diameter. That is done at DR1A on all masts, no regular bearings at all except on the g
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-05/msg00306.html (12,142 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] 4 square for 80 (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <peter.voelpel@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 00:09:43 +0200
I think the majority is using more then an few. 73 Peter, DJ7WW Remember the analysis showing that the loss in radials is the sum of all the I squared R factors from each radial. When we have MANY ra
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00424.html (10,180 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu