Mail Archive Search: <+from:rhodesj@pionet.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:rhodesj@pionet.net: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] relays (score: 1): Author: rhodesj@pionet.net (Jim Rhodes KC0XU); Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1998 22:55:24 -0500; Why not put the relays at the feedpoint, shorting out a small coil or loop for SSB and open for CW. Would need a little higher current rating but would be easier to feed power to relays. Jim Rhodes K; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00289.html (8,455 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Clarification of previous post! (score: 1): Author: rhodesj@pionet.net (Jim Rhodes KC0XU); Date: Sun, 19 Apr 1998 23:59:06 -0500; Sounds more expensive to me!! -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owne; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00551.html (7,957 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Bruene and Maxwell (score: 1): Author: rhodesj@pionet.net (Jim Rhodes KCOXU); Date: Sun, 8 Jun 1997 02:04:17 -0500 (CDT); I am far from an expert, but it always seemed to me that the 2 of them were just talking about the same thing from different ends. Maxwell's theories seem to work well in antenna design and Bruene's; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-06/msg00277.html (7,663 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Tower Height (score: 1): Author: rhodesj@pionet.net (Jim Rhodes KCOXU); Date: Tue, 27 May 1997 23:15:07 -0500 (CDT); You have to realize that the soil conductivity would change over a large area,not just under the tower. This would have the effect of raising ground level at the fresnel(sp?) point. Jim Rhodes KC0XU; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-05/msg00651.html (9,026 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]