Mail Archive Search: <+from:rlvz@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:rlvz@aol.com: 125 ]

Total 125 documents matching your query.

21. [TowerTalk] Balloon recommendations needed! (score: 1): Author: RLVZ@aol.com (RLVZ@aol.com); Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 14:59:01 EST; Hello Towertalkians We would be grateful for your input on using a Balloon and wire on 160 meters. Such as: 1) What wire size should be used on various balloon sizes? 2) What is better: a single ball; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00203.html (7,304 bytes)
22. [TowerTalk] What type of nonconductive guys do you use? (score: 1): Author: RLVZ@aol.com (RLVZ@aol.com); Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 22:27:45 EDT; I have a light-duty application that requires non-conductive guys for 6 months. I don't want to spend the big money on phillystran for 6 months. I know there are various materials used. What have you; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00064.html (7,578 bytes)
23. [TowerTalk] Wanted: Potting Heads for old Phillystran (score: 1): Author: RLVZ@aol.com (RLVZ@aol.com); Date: Sat, 4 Sep 1999 12:20:38 EDT; Would like to purchase Potting Heads, Catalog # 9902, .24" to .31" diameter cable. Thanks, Dick-K9OM -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com A; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00093.html (6,869 bytes)
24. [TowerTalk] Needed: Rohn 25 guy bracket w/torque arms (score: 1): Author: RLVZ@aol.com (RLVZ@aol.com); Date: Sat, 4 Sep 1999 12:22:51 EDT; Need Rohn 25 guy bracket(s) with torque arms. Prefer used. Thanks, Dick-K9OM -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests:; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00094.html (6,786 bytes)
25. [TowerTalk] Any non-conductive alternatives for phillystran? (score: 1): Author: RLVZ@aol.com (RLVZ@aol.com); Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 23:13:05 EDT; Years ago I purchased some non-conductive grey colored guy line from AES. It worked very well on my Rohn 25 except for some stretching. Has anyone used non-conductive material for guys besides philly; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-08/msg00588.html (7,346 bytes)
26. [TowerTalk] 80 - 40 Meter Vertical Ideas (score: 1): Author: RLVZ@aol.com; Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 11:53:48 EDT; Hi guys, I plan to homebrew a combination 80-40 meter vertical to place at the edge of a saltwater river. I am thinking of using one of the following options. Your thoughts would be greatly appreciat; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00127.html (7,788 bytes)
27. [TowerTalk] Horizontal + Vertical Polarization Question (score: 1): Author: RLVZ@aol.com; Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 22:09:57 EST; Hey Guys, Has anyone experimented with feeding both a horizontally polarized and vertically polarized antenna simultaneously on HF? Such as, feeding a horizontally polarized yagi and a vertical on 20; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00506.html (7,924 bytes)
28. [TowerTalk] Multiple tower/stack question (score: 1): Author: RLVZ@aol.com; Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 22:13:14 EST; Hi Towertalkians, I sure do appreciate you guys as you provide a wealth of helpful tower and antenna information. I'd appreciate your thoughts on how to place multiple towers at a Florida QTH for bes; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00090.html (7,339 bytes)
29. [TowerTalk] Need article on improving TH7DX on 10-m CW (score: 1): Author: RLVZ@aol.com; Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:14:01 EST; A friend would greatly appreciate a copy of the article done by a former Hy-Gain engineer... who discussed improving the TH7-DX gain on 10-meters CW. The article stated that gain was down about 2dB o; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00528.html (7,072 bytes)
30. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Feeding 2 Inv V's with 1 feedline (score: 1): Author: RLVZ@aol.com; Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 15:50:08 EST; The problem with using EZNEC is that for the average person not familar with EZNEC ... it may take more time to model the program than it would have to install the antenna and tune it. And the averag; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00476.html (7,365 bytes)
31. [TowerTalk] SWR Problem with Tri-Bander - help! (score: 1): Author: RLVZ@aol.com; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:10:55 EST; Hi Guys, I've got a Hy-Gain TH3-Mark4 that has a rather unusual SWR problem and wonder if you have any thoughts on fixing the problem. Here's the scoop: 1) The SWR is always fine on 10 and 20 meters.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00529.html (7,514 bytes)
32. Re: [TowerTalk] How can a SteppIR Perform So Well? (score: 1): Author: RLVZ@aol.com; Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 13:07:45 EST; The "STEPPIR has 3 active elements on each band whereas the C3E only has 2 active elements on 15 & 20 meters, with 3 elements on 10-m. So I don't see where the SteppIR has "half the elements" nor is; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00474.html (10,619 bytes)
33. Re: [TowerTalk] How can a SteppIR Perform So Well? (score: 1): Author: RLVZ@aol.com; Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 13:13:09 EST; Since the C3 is basically a 2-element antenna... if we are comparing prices, shouldn't we be comparing the C3 to a 2-Element SteppIR which costs $849? 73, K9OM In a message dated 3/17/2005 12:36:55 P; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00476.html (13,174 bytes)
34. Re: [TowerTalk] How can a SteppIR Perform So Well? (score: 1): Author: RLVZ@aol.com; Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 16:09:06 EST; But these two antennas are not comparable as the C3 is a 2-element design and the the SteppIR is a 3-element. A fair comparison is the C3 and the 2-element SteppIR! Let's compare apples to apples. In; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00497.html (11,190 bytes)
35. [TowerTalk] 1/4 wave vs. 1/2 wave Vertical (score: 1): Author: RLVZ@aol.com; Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 10:31:42 EST; Hi Guys, I'd sure appreciate your thoughts on the following: Would there be any advantages or disadvantages of converting a 1/4 vertical on 160 meters to a 1/2 wave or 5/8 wave vertical, when the met; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00013.html (7,768 bytes)
36. [TowerTalk] Steel guy wire breaking strength? (score: 1): Author: RLVZ@aol.com; Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 13:22:25 EDT; Hi guys, I'm on the road and don't have my Rohn book handy. Would someone please let me know what the breaking strength is on the following size steel guy cables: 3/16", 1/4", and 5/16"? Thank You! D; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00483.html (7,395 bytes)
37. [TowerTalk] Serious RF Problem (score: 1): Author: RLVZ@aol.com; Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 19:34:38 EDT; Hi Guys, I'd appreciate your thoughts on a RF problem at my summer QTH: A tribander is mounted on a self-supporting 50' tower. (no guy wires) The tower is mounted 3' away from the shack... which is a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00295.html (7,594 bytes)
38. [TowerTalk] How Far from the house not to effect antenna pattern? (score: 1): Author: RLVZ@aol.com; Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 10:59:14 EDT; Hi Guys, One question I have always had about towers that are placed near the house is how much does the house wiring and gutters effect the antenna radiation pattern? And if the house has a metal ro; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00641.html (8,747 bytes)
39. [TowerTalk] Slant Feed Vertical Question (score: 1): Author: RLVZ@aol.com; Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:28:50 EDT; Hi Guys, As an option to Shunt Feeding a tower I am considering a Slant Feed. Slant Feeds are often used on AM Broadcast towers. Slant feeds can have a couple of mechancial advantages over Shunt Feed; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00776.html (7,130 bytes)
40. [TowerTalk] How to get "50 ohms J Zero"? (score: 1): Author: RLVZ@aol.com; Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:04:58 EDT; Hi Guys, Please advise what instruments can be used to adjust an antenna for "50 ohms J Zero"? I believe the MFJ 259B may do it but don't know how accurate it is. Are there precision instruments that; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00567.html (7,403 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]