Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:rxdesign@ssvecnet.com: 303 ]

Total 303 documents matching your query.

181. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Stacking question - another reality data point (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 14:32:07 -0400
My apologies to Seymour - he'd chastise me for that :>) I think I was thinking of Bill ... ZS6CCY ... Seymour is W6CCP ... CHARLIE CHARLIE PAPPA! Gary K(RX Seymour, W6CCY does this ... or at least di
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-08/msg00146.html (13,769 bytes)

182. Re: [TowerTalk] 40 meter rotatable dipole (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 13:09:38 -0400
definitely at a 90. The 40 could and probably will interact, potentially a significant amount, with the 15 and contrary to some beliefs and statements "it doesn't interact because my SWR is fine" it
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-08/msg00232.html (9,202 bytes)

183. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotator and Beam advice requested (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 16:24:48 -0400
are you sure you're not confusing winds with storms? My understanding was that it should be retracted if there is any chance of lightning greatly reducing the exposed area. g. --Original Message-- Fr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-08/msg00258.html (11,476 bytes)

184. Re: [TowerTalk] Cushcraft D3W (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:13:22 -0400
Had one at 90' in AZ - worked 200+ countries on each of the WARC bands in 3 years. Great antenna. Gary K9RX I have a D3-W (with the 10 Mhz driven element extension) up at 50 feet with a 6 meter beam
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-08/msg00279.html (9,903 bytes)

185. Re: [TowerTalk] Strength of installation raising cable for the LM470? (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 20:56:39 -0400
If I understand you correctly why not go to a 2:1 pulley system instead of a 4:1. Or compromise and use a 3:1! The 2:1 only requires a pulley at the attachment point - the top return goes to the rais
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-08/msg00308.html (11,131 bytes)

186. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn GAR30 anchors for 55g tower? (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 07:59:53 -0400
yes - I have them on my 55 installation - they tower is to be 147' - the highest guy point 122' and the guy anchors are out 140'... the top guy is 5/16" and 11200# philly. Drop me a note if you need
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00037.html (8,759 bytes)

187. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR600 male DIN (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 08:16:11 -0400
I'm signed in at Tessco - I can't find this specific part number and the lowest price I'm seeing is $3.11 for the 50JAA7 (list of $4.75). Gary K9RX http://www.rfsworld.com/websearchecat/datasheets/?q
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00091.html (9,322 bytes)

188. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR600 male DIN (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 18:36:17 -0400
I was logged in and seeing a discounted price - $3.11! I couldn't even find the cable you had specified. If indeed you can get 7/8" brand new for under $2 ... that is one heck of a buy. Do you have a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00104.html (9,442 bytes)

189. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna modeling question (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 07:51:34 -0400
the issue is more than likely not going to be 'what is the interaction of the 160 on the 40 ... rather it is going to be what is the interaction of the 40 on the 160 ... and my guess (after having pl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00116.html (8,137 bytes)

190. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna modeling question (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 07:32:58 -0400
John, Charlie, My apologies! I had done quite a bit of modeling for my own situation and found that what seemed like ANY piece of metal of most any length coupled current in (and it does) and screwed
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00141.html (10,240 bytes)

191. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR600 male DIN (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 11:26:53 -0400
Forgive me - I've replied to Gerald's email but this is directed to the thread in general: WHY all the concern for sealed connectors and connector types? I've been using UHF for 49 years and the only
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00168.html (11,352 bytes)

192. [TowerTalk] LMR600 male DIN - baluns, coax and grounding immediately (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 10:51:11 -0400
and more than likely ANYTHING you had done to waterproof the connectors including water proof connectors would have failed with a direct hit. Just because a connector might be water proof doesn't mak
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00186.html (16,223 bytes)

193. Re: [TowerTalk] Swinging gate for rotating tower (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2016 07:57:40 -0400
I bought 2 hinges from Lowes ... they're for a fence - they JUST fit my R55 tower ... I was going to use 2 of them spaced about 6" apart with a solid 1/2" stainless rod going between them through the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00237.html (8,656 bytes)

194. Re: [TowerTalk] SWR Analyzer / BC Interferance (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 12:01:48 -0400
why not the SARK?! No BC issues here ... Gary K9RX Quick question. Is the MFJ series of SWR analyzer's the only ones susceptible to BC interference? Any issues with the Comet or RigExpert series? I k
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00283.html (7,908 bytes)

195. Re: [TowerTalk] 4 square for 80 (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 18:07:53 -0400
Hey Bill! Been a while - glad things are progressing back out in KH land ... First I'd say what K3LR says is good advice - I can't contest it - just he's had many years of experience and experimentat
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00339.html (12,117 bytes)

196. Re: [TowerTalk] 4 square for 80 (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 20:37:08 -0400
TREAD lightly as well... (Bill) as for 'how close' someone had asked.... when I model a HiZ 4 element RX array I can move one of my towers as much as 500' away and it STILL has a noticeable impact on
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00343.html (12,307 bytes)

197. Re: [TowerTalk] 4 square for 80 (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 17:30:28 -0400
Wayne, Can you add more detail as to how it changed please - in the last scenario you have listed? I have no idea what this means: "DX reports = antenna #1 (NE) being the only one detectable ???? " ?
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00389.html (14,147 bytes)

198. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotor Cable (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 09:25:03 -0400
one suggestion: use 12 ga Romex or similar to the base - and then a cable with #14 stranded instead of 12 up the tower. That might be easier to find. The sense wires dont' have to be anything larger
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00400.html (9,318 bytes)

199. Re: [TowerTalk] Legal Power measurement Discussion (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 11:46:00 -0400
I think more is being made of this then what it is - the reason why it was defined as "supplied to the antenna" is that is indeed simple - and doesn't necessitate any math/measurements beyond that si
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00445.html (14,476 bytes)

200. Re: [TowerTalk] 4 square for 80 (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 11:49:13 -0400
Im' sure someone else will respond to this - and I'm sure Steve you'll say 'duh' as I know you know this: increasing the CM resistance seen REDUCES the CM currents - thus reduces the losses in the pr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00447.html (9,963 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu