Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:rxdesign@ssvecnet.com: 303 ]

Total 303 documents matching your query.

21. [TowerTalk] silly guy preform dead end question... (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 13:58:24 -0700
I have always used cable clamps ... but this time around the preforms were about as cheap as the cable clamps. I have researched here there and (most) everywhere but cannot find clear cut instruction
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00809.html (7,746 bytes)

22. [TowerTalk] Question on guy wires (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 21:08:31 -0700
I am in the process of putting up 140' of R45 using a RTS (Rotating Tower System) arrangement on the top 100'. I have chosen to use 1/4" guys throughout. Unfortunately the holes in the floating guy r
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00398.html (7,862 bytes)

23. [TowerTalk] Torgue arms on Rohn tower.... (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 15:14:43 -0700
I have read several times here (possibly always the same person posting) that Rohn torque arms do nothing to reduce the twisting of a tower - i.e. they do not reduce the torque transmitted to the tow
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00421.html (7,104 bytes)

24. [TowerTalk] Baluns (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 20:30:45 -0700
Anyone familiar with and have experience with the W2DU baluns sold by UNadilla? Specifically the ones with the built in lightning arrestor? Will this short with a strike or is this not a problem? I w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00184.html (7,295 bytes)

25. [TowerTalk] HELP...IC746PRO (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 08:57:11 -0700
I know this is slightly off topic - but only slightly... I am, was using an Autek RF1 meter to determine my swr on a new F12 240N but the lengths are considerably shorter than the manual (and everyon
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00665.html (7,856 bytes)

26. Re: [TowerTalk] [Force 12 Talk] Mag 240N questions....URGENT (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:51:11 -0700
thanks... I just wish there was some consistency here... your saying something completely different than what all are saying. All replies now - maybe 6 of them - all of them left the reflector exactl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00677.html (10,229 bytes)

27. [TowerTalk] receive antenna for 80/160 (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 13:34:10 -0700
Curious if anyone has had experience using the DX Engineering 4 sq active receive antenna? If so how well did it work in increasing the S/N ratio on DX? What spacing and ground system did you use? Di
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00186.html (6,973 bytes)

28. [TowerTalk] Yagi gain question (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 19:45:21 -0700
73 de Bill K2EKI would beg to differ with you ... a dipole is indeed only as much as the gain plotsshow lower for the most part - this assumes however that they are BOTH at the same elevation.I have
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00444.html (8,157 bytes)

29. [TowerTalk] formatting on TowerTalk (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 09:36:32 -0700
Can whomever runs the TowerTalk group please check into formatting the incoming messages? I am a member of the Force12 group and it automatically displays a properly formatted message. TowerTalk just
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00455.html (7,423 bytes)

30. Re: [TowerTalk] formatting on TowerTalk [TEST on f12 - please ignore] (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 10:13:08 -0700
hmmm.... ok.... hard to believe it is on this end as I have absolutely no problems with the Force12 group. Are you looking at the messages online or in a received email? I am talking about only the m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00458.html (9,382 bytes)

31. Re: [TowerTalk] formatting on TowerTalk [TEST on f12 - please ignore] (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 10:16:23 -0700
alright ... nevermind... it DID appear fine (online) THIS time. [on both groups] -- Original Message -- From: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com> To: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>; "tower" <towerta
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00460.html (8,299 bytes)

32. Re: [TowerTalk] formatting on TowerTalk - last post - sorry (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 11:33:13 -0700
don't know... it has got me.... Force12 group works with nothing to be done - it automatically formats posts and I see these online properly formatted. But there are many posts on Towertalk (not just
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00468.html (10,169 bytes)

33. Re: [TowerTalk] formatting on TowerTalk (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:54:08 -0700
I know... I have heard this from several - but there is also a post on the group where someone else is seeing the same thing (of course again blaming the sender) so I am not alone in seeing it ... ag
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00472.html (10,408 bytes)

34. [TowerTalk] formatting on TowerTalk (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 13:30:24 -0700
again... I am using the same program for BOTH f12 and Tower... f12 works fine... tower does not. so if I need to change settings why is it not needed for f12!? This implies something on the tower gro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00474.html (7,772 bytes)

35. Re: [TowerTalk] formatting on TowerTalk (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 14:53:18 -0700
although this still does not explain why it works with the F12 group and not the Tower group I have checked and my settings were for html. I have kept this but added the wrap ... just read the rest o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00477.html (9,892 bytes)

36. Re: [TowerTalk] formatting on TowerTalk (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 20:56:20 -0700
yes I was an am open minded... see my later post! Someone did direct me on how to change my settings... indeed it STILL does not answer the facts of what is happening: since it is believed to be my m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00486.html (11,056 bytes)

37. [TowerTalk] Holy SteppIR! (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 11:41:51 -0700
agreed... no disrespect to this guy but this is WAY too high (if the top is at 220' as the cover page shows). Had he placed it so the bottom antenna was at say 45 - 55' then it would have been a kill
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00503.html (8,154 bytes)

38. [TowerTalk] Holy SteppIR! (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:07:45 -0700
adjusting the vertical tilt of an antenna does nothing to raise (or even change) the radiation angle... or at least this was the conclusion W2PV came to in his book. g. -- Interesting, Clay. I went b
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00518.html (8,086 bytes)

39. Re: [TowerTalk] Holy SteppIR! (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:20:23 -0700
huh? He can adjust the frequency but not the radiation angle. This is strictly a function of height above ground for the major lobe. Or are you saying he has a coax phasing line that is adjustable? T
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00536.html (9,905 bytes)

40. [TowerTalk] off topic - dx question... (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 18:02:34 -0700
Forgive me - after being off the air for ~ a decade and now getting back into it... Hopefully someone can tell me where there is a group like this dedicated to DX'ing. Since a good share of TT'ers ar
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-02/msg00091.html (7,392 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu