Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:steve@karinya.net: 407 ]

Total 407 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Coaxial antenna elements (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 16:29:00 +0100
Hi folks - I'm brand new to the list. My interest in reduced-size HF antennas has often led me to consider the technique proposed by N0KHQ (amongst others) of using coaxial cable as an antenna elemen
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00195.html (8,566 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Coaxial antenna elements (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 19:59:19 +0100
Dan, Thanks for the supportive comments. Yes, I spotted that. Interestingly, on another site he has the braid and inner conductor open circuit at one end of the reflector, although in the next drawin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00203.html (8,179 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] The Vertical and the Balun (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 09:31:14 +0100
Many years ago I used a 50ft vertical on 160m quite successfully. Top loading was key to its success. I top-loaded it using 6 equally spaced wires which came away at 45 degrees from the vertical and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00295.html (9,334 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] The Vertical and the Balun (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 16:35:45 +0100
Hi Al, The "capacity umbrella" was formed from 6 radial wires, each 30ft long coming away from the top of the mast at 45 degrees to the vertical. From the 30ft point onwards they became insulated guy
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00297.html (10,303 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] The Vertical and the Balun (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 20:20:13 +0100
John, I made a mistake in thinking it was an IERE paper. In fact it was an article by Jack Belrose (VE2CV) in the September 1982 edition of Ham Radio entitled: "Folded umbrella top-loaded vertical an
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00302.html (8,537 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Coil Formula (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 15:19:36 +0100
Clint, About 20.5uH according to the usual formula for solenoid coils. Steve G3TXQ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing li
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00457.html (7,985 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Coil Formula (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 15:38:14 +0100
Or if you really can't be bothered with the maths, try one of the many online calculators, e.g.: http://www.66pacific.com/calculators/coil_calc.aspx http://www.crystalradio.net/cal/indcal2.shtml Stev
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00459.html (7,738 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] ANTENNA ANALYZER? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2008 12:34:39 +0100
Ronnie, A couple of considerations which might tip the balance one way or the other: 1) Do you want VHF coverage? The ZM30 doesn't go above 30MHz. 2) Do you want to do measurements at the top of your
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00004.html (7,210 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Trapped in antenna trap confusion (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:53:08 +0100
Bill, You might also want to look at another small wire beam called the Hexbeam. It has a smaller turning radius than the Moxon, and can be built as a 5 band (20m thru 10m) version, or even a 6 band
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00388.html (8,449 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] G5RV vs. 2 element yagi (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 21:00:54 +0100
John, I have a 2-element home-built Broadband Hexbeam at 20ft and a 132ft centre-fed doublet with its apex at 20ft. The Hexbeam consistently outperforms the doublet on 14MHz and up. There's an audio
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00421.html (9,639 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] G5RV vs. 2 element yagi (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 21:56:19 +0100
Dave, Just to be pedantic ...... .... the 132ft doublet IS a dipole (it has 2 elements), and it IS resonant on 20m - it just happens to be 4 half-waves instead of one :) And the 132ft doublet in its
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00424.html (8,346 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] G5RV vs. 2 element yagi (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 23:06:42 +0100
Dave, 1) The doublet was fed with a short length of open-wire and correctly matched through a Palstar balanced ATU. 2) The AGC on the receiver was OFF, and the RF GAIN backed off to preserve linearit
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00426.html (9,906 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Lock nuts revisited (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:43:27 +0100
Roger, I'm no mechanical engineer - just a lowly communications engineer - but I'm trying to understand the point you are making: Isn't this exactly what happens when you tighten the head on a conven
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00493.html (8,025 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Lock nuts revisited (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 22:04:16 +0100
Roger, OK I think I understand what you are saying. In my layman's terms, when you torque up a conventional bolt some of the torque converts to a linear "stretch" force on the bolt (via the ramp) and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00497.html (10,102 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Loop vs Dipole...I'm original "asker" (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:19:59 +0100
I'm with Jerry. "In physical science the first essential step in the direction of learning any subject is to find principles of numerical reckoning and practicable methods for measuring some quality
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00590.html (9,559 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] Loop vs Dipole...I'm original "asker" (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:13:05 +0100
K8JHR, The Kelvin quote was slightly "tongue in cheek", but I think his appeal for "numeracy" has some value. I wasn't arguing that modelling is better than empirical measurement, but that modelling
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00598.html (10,007 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] Loop vs Dipole...I'm original "asker" (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:03:32 +0100
At the risk of "flogging this horse to death", but just to re-inforce Jim's point: In developing my new Broadband Hexbeam I consistently saw a small, but significant, frequency offset between what EZ
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00603.html (9,402 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] Modeling with NEC-4 (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 16:20:16 +0100
The Paul Baldock I used to know would just have built it and it would have worked straight off :) How are you doing, Paul? Steve G3TXQ _______________________________________________ ________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00038.html (7,286 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] Open wire feed line length (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 22:12:17 +0100
Because open-wire feeder is often used in applications where it is unmatched - for example a doublet. Although the characteristic impedance of the feeder might be 450 Ohms, in these applications the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00058.html (8,049 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] Is there a point of diminishing returns on gain for stacking HF beams? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:20:12 +0100
Also, if you are talking about vertical stacking you can actually make things worse at low take-off angles, depending on how high you can get the lower antenna(s). Take a look at this analysis on my
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00375.html (8,138 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu