Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:tedc@nucleus.com: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] A Capacitively Fed 102 Degree Vertical for 160 Meters (score: 1)
Author: "tedc@nucleus.com" <tedc@nucleus.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 17:56:59 -0600
I have been doing some design work for a vertical that will give me less than 1.3:1 VSWR across the entire 160 Meter band with either very little manual adjustment or with the right circuitry the ant
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-03/msg00216.html (9,205 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] A Capacitively Fed 102 Degree Vertical for 160Meters (score: 1)
Author: "tedc@nucleus.com" <tedc@nucleus.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 19:23:54 -0600
Jim, I have to go the tower route due to no trees tall enough in this area. And I plan on a 120 radial grouns system. Ted -- Original Message -- Sent : 3/22/2015 6:26:21 PM To : towertalk@contesting.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-03/msg00219.html (9,212 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] A Capacitively Fed 102 Degree Vertical for160 Meters (score: 1)
Author: "tedc@nucleus.com" <tedc@nucleus.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 19:33:43 -0600
Grant, If your feedpoint Z is 25 ohms then your antenna is a 90 degree antenna. I cannot use a wire antenna due to lack of tall trees in the area. I could probably switch in combinations of fixed mic
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-03/msg00220.html (11,753 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted L Radials... (score: 1)
Author: "tedc@nucleus.com" <tedc@nucleus.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 16:11:55 -0600
Alfredo, Put as many short radials as you can, but if you can sneak a few a 1/4 wavelength on 160 Meters, they don't have to be straight it would be better. Ted VE6AMR -- Original Message -- From : A
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-03/msg00226.html (8,261 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] A Capacitively Fed 102 Degree Vertical for 160 Meters (score: 1)
Author: "tedc@nucleus.com" <tedc@nucleus.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:58:05 -0600
Doug, With your inverted L, how high is the vertical section and what is it made of? Also how long is the horizontal section and how is it made. I will see if I can find a schematic of the SA2550 so
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-03/msg00228.html (8,777 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] A Capacitively Fed 102 Degree Vertical for 160Meters (score: 1)
Author: "tedc@nucleus.com" <tedc@nucleus.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 12:25:26 -0600
Jim, Looking at the spacing on the 500 pfd. cap in the SA2550 it should be plenty robust for most current fed systems; however the breakdown voltage may not be high enough for a voltage fed high Z sy
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-03/msg00230.html (8,773 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] A Capacitively Fed 102 Degree Vertical for 160Meters (score: 1)
Author: "tedc@nucleus.com" <tedc@nucleus.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:28:34 -0600
I'm looking at a tower that is 137 ft. high and 12 inches on a face. Alowing for shortening due to the length diameter ratio, ths is an electrical 102 degrees on 160. The series capacitane required y
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-03/msg00231.html (11,664 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] A Capacitively Fed 102 Degree Vertical for 160Meters (score: 1)
Author: "tedc@nucleus.com" <tedc@nucleus.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 17:08:14 -0600
Richard, That is the kind of circuitry I was concidering. I hadn't determined exactly what kind of circuit but the phase detector sounds very good! Ted Clapham VE6AMR -- Original Message -- Karlquist
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-03/msg00233.html (9,529 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu