Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:tod@k0to.us: 169 ]

Total 169 documents matching your query.

121. [TowerTalk] Estimating RF Choke impedance (score: 1)
Author: "Tod -MN" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 02:04:27 -0500
This is a follow up to Jim Brown's note on my measurements of choke impedance using a power meter. As Jim pointed out, the circuit he used on page 31 of his tutorial allows one to measure the impedan
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00648.html (7,933 bytes)

122. Re: [TowerTalk] Crimped PL-259's (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 09:04:59 -0600
I thought I saw some crimped UHF connectors on the Mouser website this morning. I think I did a search for Connectors - RF - crimped - male - UHF to get to the list of male, crimped, UHF connectors.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-10/msg00130.html (9,277 bytes)

123. [TowerTalk] MFJ259B (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 07:55:34 -0600
Is there someone out there who has been thinking of selling their MFJ259B -- possible so they can replace it with an MFJ269? I am looking for a second unit for use here in Idaho. Please contact me if
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00000.html (6,100 bytes)

124. Re: [TowerTalk] 80/40 coax trap dipole design (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 20:10:33 -0700
See the Ham Radio article by Yardley Beers in which he discusses non-resonant trap dipoles and how you select the non-resonant frequency. Tod, K0TO _______________________________________________ ___
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-12/msg00242.html (8,547 bytes)

125. Re: [TowerTalk] 80/40 coax trap dipole design (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:40:55 -0700
Here is the link to my web site. On the page in the antenna column you can click on the Yardley Beers article that details about how to build a dual band dipole that has traps which are NOT resonant
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-12/msg00252.html (9,947 bytes)

126. Re: [TowerTalk] Gigavac Relays (score: 1)
Author: "Tod Olson"<tod@k0to.us>
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 08:49:16 -0700
Jim: I control my latching relays with one control line plus ground. It requires two voltages [+ / - ] and a simple RC circuit in each + and - source used to feed the control line for the relay. The
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-12/msg00378.html (12,596 bytes)

127. [TowerTalk] Using aluminum wire [or aluminum clad wire] (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 09:25:19 -0700
I have found that aluminum wire is quite "adequate" for center supported dipoles for 80m or shorter wavelengths. I would expect that the same thing is true for slopers angled down from towers -- but
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-12/msg00438.html (11,029 bytes)

128. [TowerTalk] Non-sagging antenna elements (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 09:25:19 -0700
Roger, K8RI, commented on the tension required to install a sloper antenna so that it had little or no 'sag' as it went from top to bottom. That caused me to contemplate the 'requirement' that all el
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-12/msg00439.html (9,551 bytes)

129. [TowerTalk] Using aluminum wire [or aluminum clad wire] (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 09:40:16 -0700
I have found that aluminum wire is quite "adequate" for center supported dipoles for 80m or shorter wavelengths. I would expect that the same thing is true for slopers angled down from towers -- but
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-12/msg00441.html (9,708 bytes)

130. [TowerTalk] Using aluminum wire (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 09:43:22 -0700
I have found that aluminum wire is quite "adequate" for center supported dipoles for 80m or shorter wavelengths. I would expect that the same thing is true for slopers angled down from towers -- but
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-12/msg00442.html (9,710 bytes)

131. [TowerTalk] Using aluminum wire (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 09:45:34 -0700
I have found that aluminum wire is quite "adequate" for center supported dipoles for 80m or shorter wavelengths. I would expect that the same thing is true for slopers angled down from towers -- but
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-12/msg00443.html (9,535 bytes)

132. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Using aluminum wire [or aluminum clad wire] (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 14:02:03 -0700
Yes. K0LR has been doing it for years. _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.con
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-12/msg00458.html (8,433 bytes)

133. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Using aluminum wire [or aluminum clad wire] (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 14:23:39 -0700
My experience using #14 aluminum fence wire with wire-wrapped connections [splices] does not suggest that there is a problem. The objective is to get a 'gas tight' connection as Hans states. I suspec
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-12/msg00461.html (9,004 bytes)

134. Re: [TowerTalk] Gigavac Relays (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 11:21:19 -0700
Rick & Jim - so much old text it is hard to find the new stuff. relays..that K0TO response => For me the simple solution was to put a series resistance followed by a shunt cap across the supply leads
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-12/msg00484.html (9,015 bytes)

135. Re: [TowerTalk] Non-sagging antenna elements (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 11:25:48 -0700
I wonder if you mean that the apparent length of the wire is increasing Erich. I suspect that the actual length of wire is not really changing -- at least not significantly -- when the wire is saggi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-12/msg00485.html (9,545 bytes)

136. Re: [TowerTalk] WHOLE HOUSE SURGE/LIGHTNING PROTECTION (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 08:17:12 -0700
I did a quick check on the cost of the Joslyn 1265-85M unit [single phase, 120/240 service entry]. It is available directly from the manufacturer, Thomas & Betts, for $1140 USD. The version for sub p
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00122.html (9,397 bytes)

137. [TowerTalk] Musing continued ----- Musing on G5RVs, baluns et al...... (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - MN" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:45:54 -0600
Jim: If one reduces the coax common mode current using a common mode choke, should one expect that the 'common mode' component of the current on the open wire line above it going to the G5RV feedpoin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00062.html (9,107 bytes)

138. Re: [TowerTalk] Musing continued ----- Musing on G5RVs, baluns et al...... (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - MN" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 13:19:36 -0600
Aha! I thought so. Two bangs for one buck. Tod, K0TO --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Steve Hunt Sent: Thursday, Febr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00066.html (10,137 bytes)

139. Re: [TowerTalk] New Tower Old Base (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 16:04:23 -0600
I have been following this thread since it started. In 2009 I was forced to replace a 'wind altered' tower with a new one. I decided to try to use the existing base for the new tower which was going
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00205.html (10,789 bytes)

140. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: Transmatch article needed! (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - MN" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 14:50:42 -0500
Sam: Tod, K0TO There is a link to the article on this page: ftp://ftp.iasi.roedu.net/mirrors/ftp.funet.fi/pub/ham/arrl/qex/Backup%20of%2 0index.wbk 73, Sam AE5L -- Original Message -- From: "Ron W8RJ
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-04/msg00016.html (10,174 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu