- 161. Re: [TowerTalk] F to UHF adapters (score: 1)
- Author: "N2TK, Tony" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>
- Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2016 15:03:15 -0400
- Guy, Tnx for the info. It sounds like I should just crimp on a PL-259 to solve the problem without adding more connectors. And I agree with you about the Amphenol elbows. Found a good stock of them m
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-10/msg00015.html (12,740 bytes)
- 162. Re: [TowerTalk] F to UHF adapters (score: 1)
- Author: "N2TK, Tony" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>
- Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2016 07:40:39 -0400
- Hi Roger, Tnx for the input. I decided to go with crimp on PL-259's as I assume they will hold up well as the other PL-259's. Since rain can't get on the cables and there is virtually no stress on th
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-10/msg00077.html (10,101 bytes)
- 163. [TowerTalk] Matching 40M (score: 1)
- Author: "N2TK, Tony" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>
- Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2016 12:04:59 -0500
- Years ago some of us used an L-C network made from a variable cap and a coil to make the amp happy at the top end of 40M with our shorty-forty's. I now have the same problem with a 3-EL 40m that is t
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-11/msg00101.html (7,554 bytes)
- 164. Re: [TowerTalk] Matching 40M (score: 1)
- Author: "N2TK, Tony" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>
- Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 08:29:32 -0500
- Hi Dave, Tnx for the input. Don't have a tuner to try that. I can make up a box with a coil and a wide spaced cap to check it out. 73, N2TK, Tony Maybe, but I would worry about the ferrites at high p
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-11/msg00106.html (10,165 bytes)
- 165. Re: [TowerTalk] Matching 40M (score: 1)
- Author: "N2TK, Tony" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>
- Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 09:32:19 -0500
- Hi John, It would be nice to add a cap. But I won't climb a crank-up without cranking it down. And this would be a pain. Trying to find an easier solution. 73, N2TK, Tony Could you install a switchab
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-11/msg00109.html (9,250 bytes)
- 166. Re: [TowerTalk] Matching 40M (score: 1)
- Author: "N2TK, Tony" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>
- Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 10:39:51 -0500
- Ed, It has been cranked down often enough. But it is not my station and it is not trivial hand cranking down the tower with a 3-el 40M and 6-el 20M and a 6-el 6M antenna on it. Unless hurricane seaso
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-11/msg00112.html (8,518 bytes)
- 167. Re: [TowerTalk] length of raised radials (score: 1)
- Author: "N2TK, Tony" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>
- Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2016 07:34:52 -0500
- I have an elevated 80M wire 4-sq. Feed points were about 8-10' above ground. The spacing of the feed points was set up for 3.65 as are the lengths of the vertical wires and the lengths of the coax fe
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-12/msg00297.html (14,086 bytes)
- 168. Re: [TowerTalk] Ground plane wire (score: 1)
- Author: "N2TK, Tony" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>
- Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 14:57:42 -0500
- I think it would be safer at my place buried in the ground. :-) 73, N2TK, Tony --Original Message-- From: TowerTalk [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of lstoskopf@cox.net Sent: Wedn
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-12/msg00344.html (8,072 bytes)
- 169. Re: [TowerTalk] 4 square for 80 (score: 1)
- Author: "N2TK, Tony" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 16:20:15 -0500
- Still trying to get feedback on the info below. Some additional info: - The 100 beads on the RG6 at the feedpoints are actually #43 - .188"L X .282"ID X .5"OD. - Any idea how much in bandwidth (high
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-01/msg00455.html (11,334 bytes)
- 170. Re: [TowerTalk] 4 square for 80 (score: 1)
- Author: "N2TK, Tony" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 18:04:44 -0500
- Jim, I agree with what you are saying. But I do not have much choice with 1/4 wave coax lines. Not enough coax to wind them through cores. That is why I am asking about 3/4 wavelength to find out wha
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-01/msg00457.html (9,231 bytes)
- 171. Re: [TowerTalk] 4 square for 80 (score: 1)
- Author: "N2TK, Tony" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 07:45:34 -0500
- Hi Wes, Yes, that is the Fair-Rite bead I am using. I don't know if 500-600 is enough. If I slip on another 100 beads on each feedline would I hear a difference? 73, N2TK, Tony The beads described ea
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-01/msg00487.html (9,907 bytes)
- 172. Re: [TowerTalk] 4 square for 80 (score: 1)
- Author: "N2TK, Tony" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 08:01:38 -0500
- Hi Jeff, Tnx for the info. Using 10% of the power hitting the dump post with 1/4 wave elevated RG6 with 100 beads at each feedpoint I get about 150 KHZ on 80M and 200 KHZ on 75M bandwidth. If I used
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-01/msg00488.html (10,190 bytes)
- 173. [TowerTalk] Coax stripping tool for crimp connectors (score: 1)
- Author: "N2TK, Tony" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>
- Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2017 13:20:18 -0500
- Does anyone offer a coax stripping tool to prepare Buryflex for PL-259 crimp connectors? The DX Engineering coaxial cable stripping tool does a nice job for solder connectors. Looking for something l
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00079.html (7,508 bytes)
- 174. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax stripping tool for crimp connectors (score: 1)
- Author: "N2TK, Tony" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>
- Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2017 13:40:06 -0500
- Maybe at Dayton? 73, N2TK, Tony Keep checking the Dx Engineering web site, they mentioned that they should have something to do this in 2017 when I asked about 3 months ago. Chuck K9LC crimp connecto
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00083.html (8,866 bytes)
- 175. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax stripping tool for crimp connectors (score: 1)
- Author: "N2TK, Tony" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>
- Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2017 15:47:50 -0500
- Dick, Tnx for the info. I sent a note to Davis RF about their stripping tool also. Will take a closer look at the RFA-4087 too. I only use either hardline, Buryflex or 9913 that still looks like new
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00090.html (12,336 bytes)
- 176. Re: [TowerTalk] waterproofing big #31 clamp-on choke (score: 1)
- Author: "N2TK, Tony" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 19:09:08 -0400
- Last winter I had a couple FT-240 Fair-Rite #31 cores on my receive antennas break. They were on the ground here in upstate NY. I assembled four 3/4 wave phase lines for my 80M 4-sq using the largest
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-06/msg00440.html (10,324 bytes)
- 177. Re: [TowerTalk] Nylok nuts (score: 1)
- Author: "N2TK, Tony" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 06:12:15 -0400
- Roger, That is weird. Checked a can of old Nyloks that had been outside for years. The nylon insert looked fine. Been using Nyloks for years without that issue up to 5/8". Except for the tower (Rohn
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-07/msg00064.html (8,096 bytes)
- 178. Re: [TowerTalk] A dumb question (score: 1)
- Author: "N2TK, Tony" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>
- Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 14:18:56 -0400
- Here in NY I am on a rock ledge. There is no way to go deeper than about 10" and in a straight line from the tower to the house. I dug a trench, lined it with about 4" of sand. Placed my control cabl
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-08/msg00310.html (10,104 bytes)
- 179. Re: [TowerTalk] A dumb question (score: 1)
- Author: "N2TK, Tony" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 13:32:03 -0400
- Since I switched years ago to Commscope F660BEF RG6 I have not had issues with critters. It is flooded, direct burial, gel coated with a PE jacket. I think I paid about $95 delivered for 1k' the last
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-08/msg00338.html (11,096 bytes)
- 180. [TowerTalk] Ham-Pro Antennas (score: 1)
- Author: "N2TK, Tony" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 08:30:29 -0400
- Does anyone know anything about the Ham-Pro Antennas? I have access to new in the box the H20-4, H15-4, H10-3, H6-6. Worthwhile taking out of the box and assembling? Who made these and when? 73, N2TK
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-09/msg00211.html (6,466 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu