Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ve4xt@mymts.net: 211 ]

Total 211 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Cost effectivel Tower height (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 14:11:25 -0600
You have to get HFTA. It's just that simple. You'll get a good picture of what your antennas need and it will help you avoid overkill, which helps avoid added costs. Too high an effective height can
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-12/msg00018.html (36,019 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] remote control of antenna switch via "wired" UHF (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2012 10:23:46 -0600
Hi Pete, It seems to me: you're attempting to couple both your two-way HF energy and the UHF energy required for switching onto a common feedline, is that right? It seems it would be doable, but the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-01/msg00005.html (10,621 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] 15 meter yagi height for 6000 miles (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 00:22:48 -0600
Hi Frank You might be thinking a bit too linearly. I have a feeling that modeling becomes MORE important the LESS you have to spend. Your 1/2 wave example might be the perfect launching point. It's a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00066.html (13,640 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Looking for a sanity check on a tower install (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 15:56:01 -0500
Seems to me the question of where to tie the upper pull ropes depends on the position of the tower. If it's alongside the building, you should be good to tie it at the top and pull. If it's laid out
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00273.html (11,309 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] [Tower Talk] Solutions for Tower Base in Fresh Water? (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 10:24:48 -0500
He didn't say it was a guyed Rohn. Could be BX or even SSV. 73,kelly ve4xt _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list Tower
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00330.html (10,711 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] Boots (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 21:02:38 -0500
Hi, Anyone have any recommendations for boots for tower work? Iım thinking light weight for climbing, but sturdy of sole for standing on rungs... 73, kelly ve4xt -- Listen to THE ROAD TRIP on CJOB ev
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00348.html (7,175 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] New ROTOR design at VISALIA DX convention (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:03:44 -0500
Not sure it answers the problem entirely, but Dave, I noticed there is a bar that connects box to a second tower leg. That spreads out the load, but I'm not convinced that it's by enough. Curious as
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00540.html (11,862 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 08:51:04 -0500
I would think you might be asking for trouble: anywhere on the side and you're going to mess up the tuning and the pattern, and on top you might have structural issues. If top isn't out of the questi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-05/msg00221.html (9,901 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] 43 feet pole for vertical (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 09:52:40 -0500
The mechanical considerations of mounting a 43-foot vertical topside on a tower are considerable. But the electrical considerations aren't trivial, either. As I understand, without proper isolation o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-11/msg00014.html (14,588 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] 43 feet pole for vertical (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 17:16:52 -0500
Rick, YES! Thanks for reminding me. You're absolutely right. And now that you've reminded me, THAT is exactly the conclusion that K9YC came to. _______________________________________________ _______
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-11/msg00022.html (9,391 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Attach a PL-259 to a 1/2" hardline (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 22:28:05 -0500
One thing I considered but never tried was simply using a double-female UHF adapter, with the centre conductor of the hardline exposed so that when it fit into one end of the adapter the end of the a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-11/msg00055.html (16,829 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Earthing a tower (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 13:14:40 -0600
Another repetition of the exploding base myth. If concrete is so explosive, and such a poor conductor, why is it often used to assist with rod-earth connections? As well, the very existence of the Uf
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-01/msg00002.html (8,893 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Stub mast loading and forces (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 13:49:18 -0500
Hi It would make sense to confirm the A3 as the cause of interaction first, no? Thinking you could simply lower the A3s and then determine what effect it has on your VHF yagi. Also, how do you know t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-04/msg00342.html (10,768 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Digging a 5'x5'x7' hole in sandy soil (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 18:18:29 -0500
Seems to me the more important consideration is whether 5x5x7 is enough for your specific situation. Most such plans are counting on a certain firmness to the soil, rather than relying solely upon th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00346.html (10,710 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Cadweld One Shot Source (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 14:29:48 -0600
therfc.com Sent from my iPhone _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-11/msg00102.html (9,077 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] HF2V Elevated or On Ground (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 16:03:37 -0500
Hi Jim I never tried elevating my HF6V (similar in principle to the 2V), but I'm not surprised by your results. My HF6V worked OK on the high bands, OK on 40 but was little better than a dummy load o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-11/msg00256.html (9,885 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] Limited space for 80 and 50 (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 08:20:28 -0600
It would be a shame to not be able to use this dipole, since your vertical antenna won't come close to it without a lot of radials. I suspect the problem isn't the antenna but rather the feedline. I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-11/msg00355.html (10,088 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] Change in SWR (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 20:21:48 -0600
Gee, I didn't realize that Ward and Steve's exhaustive tribander tests and subsequent report constituted 'no facts' to support Jim's argument. Seems to me the majority of knowledgeable antenna folks
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00077.html (11,309 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] Change in SWR (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 21:04:26 -0600
As I recall, the US government also bought a bunch of those Maxrad dipole centre insulators that a band saw revealed to be nothing more than a non-reactive resistor between the dipole legs. 73, kelly
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00078.html (12,851 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] Change in SWR (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 21:13:45 -0600
Yup. And I've broken through mondo pileups on DX stations first call with my MA5B at 30 feet. I've had folk in SS say I'm the loudest guy they hear. One guy in California said I was 40 over s9, and I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00079.html (10,267 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu