Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ve4xt@mymts.net: 211 ]

Total 211 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] [MWA] OH8X 80-160 monster tower collapses (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 12:30:46 -0600
I offer my condolences to Radio Arcala, but I have a question about that explanation: shouldn't the engineering of the tower system have accounted for the possible failure of a windload-mitigation sy
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00161.html (9,204 bytes)

22. Re: [TowerTalk] [MWA] OH8X 80-160 monster tower collapses (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:29:28 -0600
Hi George, We know that from the explanation on the Arcala website. Doesn't answer the question, however. You shouldn't design a tower system such that the difference between maximum and minimum wind
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00208.html (14,001 bytes)

23. Re: [TowerTalk] OWA Inventor? (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 15:33:08 -0600
Virtually every reference on Google searches to the Optimized Wideband Antenna refers to WA3FET as the inventor. None refers to N6BT. Most also co-credit K3LR for the OWA. You might be able to outfox
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00240.html (9,339 bytes)

24. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Base Removal (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 23:20:54 -0600
Dexpan also specifies a method for cracking concrete even when there is no to little room for expansion. It just means drilling more holes. But since each hole has to be 80-90% of the depth, not sure
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-01/msg00276.html (12,406 bytes)

25. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn foundation information (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 13:48:05 -0600
Considering 55G is only rated for 6.5 sq.ft at 50 feet self-supporting (70 MPH), 1.5 sq.ft (80 MPH) and not rated for anything at 90 MPH, not sure I see the point, either. Lots of good self-supportin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-02/msg00154.html (9,107 bytes)

26. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Hustler 6-BTV installation (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 08:24:25 -0500
The 43-foot vertical: better antennas through marketing... _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-04/msg00191.html (8,981 bytes)

27. Re: [TowerTalk] Poor eHam reviews of the AV 480 (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 18:26:01 -0500
Most of what eHam calls 'reviews' are pretty meaningless. Either:1. The person is just so enamoured of their purchase decision they can't see any flaws,2. The person feels their results prove the pro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-04/msg00277.html (9,763 bytes)

28. Re: [TowerTalk] Keeping antennas straight (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 12:24:39 -0500
What about pinning antennas to mast (so they remain aligned to one another), NOT pinning mast to rotator (so a really bad wind doesn't destroy your rotator) and using a rotator without physical stops
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-04/msg00375.html (9,273 bytes)

29. Re: [TowerTalk] DC ground with a 1/4 goundplane (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 10:11:23 -0500
Is there any reason why replicating the coil at the base of a Butternut HF9V wouldn't work? A few feet of enameled copper wire, about a one-inch form (discarded), and you're done. IIRC, you can downl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-04/msg00567.html (10,021 bytes)

30. Re: [TowerTalk] "Antenna Tuner" (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Sat, 3 May 2014 11:09:37 -0500
Not quite. A dummy load presents a 50-ohm non-reactive load. A resonant quarter-wave monopole over a decent ground might have an impedance of about 12 ohms. You can probably play with the length of t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00068.html (10,673 bytes)

31. Re: [TowerTalk] "Antenna Tuner" (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Sun, 4 May 2014 09:49:43 -0500
May not have been the best example, but the point is that depending on the antenna, resonance and 50 ohms do not always coincide and that some form of matching is required. The lower impedances may h
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00072.html (11,238 bytes)

32. Re: [TowerTalk] B & W Folded Dipole (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 03:13:09 -0500
In Sept. 2010, W1ZR wrote not a review, but an unflattering analysis of terminated folded dipoles based on his analyses and those of VE2CV. It's on the QST archives. Basically, the caveat is understa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00278.html (8,381 bytes)

33. Re: [TowerTalk] MFJ Repairs (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 10:14:02 -0500
It's always seemed to me that MFJ was a bit of a crap shoot. You either get something reliable and it serves you well or you get a piece of mighty fine junk and you chalk it up to a momentary lapse o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-09/msg00003.html (8,252 bytes)

34. [TowerTalk] Delhi DMX-48 base stubs (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 16:50:50 -0500
Hi all, Anyone have any suggestions for subs for the stubs? Wade Antenna changed the leg profile slightly, so new ones, apparently, don't work, and I'm having trouble locating stubs with the old prof
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-09/msg00066.html (7,494 bytes)

35. [TowerTalk] Base stubs for Delhi DMX48 (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 11:02:27 -0500
Hi all, Iım not seeing any evidence of my posts going through, so if this is a duplicate, please forgive. Need base stubs, or a suitable MacGyver, for a DMX48. This is a freestanding tower similar to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-09/msg00067.html (6,953 bytes)

36. Re: [TowerTalk] Modeling a ground plane (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 10:48:57 -0500
Hi Bill, At six feet, your radials are still coupling to the Earth and thus being detuned. Which is why adjusting your radiator has a greater effect. Can't dismiss also the odds of common-mode curren
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-09/msg00108.html (10,923 bytes)

37. [TowerTalk] Mosley (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 12:09:59 -0500
Hi all, I have an old Mosley tribander that I got years ago. Any key signs to look for to know if itıs the high-power capable version or a Junior? Thanks Kelly ve4xt _________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-09/msg00242.html (6,850 bytes)

38. Re: [TowerTalk] Anchor Bolt Material (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 23:36:55 -0500
Use larger bolts? Just sayin' 73, Kelly Ve4xt Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contes
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-10/msg00153.html (10,592 bytes)

39. Re: [TowerTalk] Anchor Bolt Material (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 00:41:22 -0500
Just trying to help. It seems you have only a few choices, some which may be unpalatable.. 1) use larger bolts to fit the holes and find a way to make them work. (Enlarge the mating holes on the base
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-10/msg00155.html (12,223 bytes)

40. Re: [TowerTalk] Guyed + self supporting /2 ?? (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 09:57:40 -0500
I'm curious, Rick, if your engineer addressed this question: to what extent does the warning to not have a fixed base on a guyed tower (use a pier pin instead) apply to the question of guying a self-
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-10/msg00176.html (14,018 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu