Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:vr2bg@harts.org.hk: 134 ]

Total 134 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [TowerTalk] Building a "little pistol" contest station and theC-31XR (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 23:22:46 +0000
N4GI was asked: In SO2Ring a 5-band LBQ, a C-3E/A & now a wire yagi (homebrew DF4SA) - I only use BPFs. Other than close to harmonics, I can still hear pretty well. 2m above the wire yagi is a SteppI
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00193.html (10,420 bytes)

122. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR Wind Damage (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 03:01:31 +0000
K4MQG further reported: If this is an older SteppIR & therefore came with the original tubes, something to remember... Apparently the dielectric constant of later tubes is different than previous one
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00819.html (8,049 bytes)

123. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR Wind Damage (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:31:29 +0000
K3MH suggested about SteppIR tubes & lengths: Calibrate just runs the motor(s) long enough that the strips can be assumed to be fully retracted & therefore extended from a known state to a known leng
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00873.html (9,044 bytes)

124. [TowerTalk] Fwd: RE: SteppIR Wind Damage (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:36:24 +0000
Correction: K4MQG, not K6DGW. Need another cup of tea. Sorry. 73, VR2BG _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTal
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00874.html (8,759 bytes)

125. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR Wind Damage (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 08:43:11 +0000
K3MH continued: I can't recall the exact shifts reported for which bands, but changing the reflector of a 3-el model on 20m at 15m by 1.5% (I think it was in that neighborhood), the F/B changes more
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00885.html (9,833 bytes)

126. Re: [TowerTalk] Please your opinion of C31XR (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 00:21:27 +0000
Took a little while to figure out who started this thread, as very quickly folks are posting responses to other folks' posts... it was WP3C. He asked about a single-boom 10/15/20m beam that would wor
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00186.html (8,972 bytes)

127. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR for C31XR (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 15:24:53 +0000
K9RX commented: I would have been happy if they could have posted the bits I needed within a month. Instead it took two months & a bit of chasing by IDD - yet the problems are still not sorted. I tel
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00137.html (7,322 bytes)

128. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR problem-update from the front lines (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 03:07:23 +0000
This thread has been interesting to watch, though a bit frustrating waiting for everyone to catch up. I see about a 6 volt drop (without or without a motor connected) from the power supply when power
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00601.html (11,615 bytes)

129. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 05:27:53 +0000
Most Force-12 products are largely just certain lengths of tubing & this is probably why they deal with their manuals as they do. There are now I think knock-off copies of Force-12 products available
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00763.html (8,643 bytes)

130. Re: [TowerTalk] Measuring coax loss with MFJ-259B (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2007 02:10:23 +0000
N4ZR noted some frequency-dependent variation in measuring loss of his feeders with the 259B, after running some LDF4-50A up his tower. K2XX then mentioned he had seen same (sorry Joe, don't remember
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00148.html (8,827 bytes)

131. Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted L for 160 meters (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 03:58:33 +0000
N4UM explained to Tom: Presumably this is with elevated radials? I thought once close enough to ground, radial length determined performance of return currents (significantly reduced beyond where the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00421.html (9,711 bytes)

132. Re: [TowerTalk] [NitPickTalk] Inverted L for 160 meters (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:23:46 +0000
N4UM had explained here to "Tom" that instead of using a longer radiator for a 160m inverted-L (then tuning out the inductive reactance with a series cap) he increases the length of the radials inste
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00486.html (8,753 bytes)

133. Re: [TowerTalk] [NitPickTalk] Inverted L for 160 meters (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 02:38:11 +0000
AB7E added to my desire to understand how it is possible for the length of radials on the ground to establish resonance of a vertical: Oh, there is no question that proximity to ground has an effect
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00526.html (13,871 bytes)

134. Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted L for 160 Meters (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 09:50:28 +0000
Or I need new glasses, or perhaps both. 73, VR2BrettGraham/QRT & unsubscribing. _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00534.html (8,320 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu