Mail Archive Search: <+from:vr2bg@harts.org.hk>

Results:

References: [ +from:vr2bg@harts.org.hk: 134 ]

Total 134 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TowerTalk] 40M Steppir? Long answer coming (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 00:43:37 +0000; N6TA shared with us some info from K7IR of SteppIR: I copy below my request for info on new yagis and this is what I got back. Read from the bottom up, if you want it in time order: Al, Sorry I forgo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00083.html (7,954 bytes)
42. Re: [TowerTalk] Hy gain DIS-71 Rotatable Dipole (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2004 00:24:23 +0000; KJ6Y added: I recently installed one of the Hygain 40 meter rotatable dipoles above a 3 element SteppIR for W8DX. About 5 feet of separation. There appeared to be minimal interaction, and of course y; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00117.html (8,756 bytes)
43. Re: [TowerTalk] FCC's NPRM on BPL (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 08:43:25 +0000; K4IA added: Even minimal signals (less than 100mw) in the HF bands can travel hundreds or thousands of miles. This raises several issues with BPL. The radio spectrum is governed by international trea; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00488.html (8,200 bytes)
44. [TowerTalk] Re: FCC's NPRM on BPL (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 02:17:42 +0000; OH6LI suggested: Does BPL make power network a telecommunications network? Telecom networks have all sorts of spurious emission specifications to fulfill. Not if you ignore the ITU - one large NA cou; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00545.html (8,922 bytes)
45. Re: [TowerTalk] BPL: Presidential Backing (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 01:55:22 +0000; tongaloa@alltel.net replied to AA6YQ about where folks of my generation or later get "turned on" technically: I can direct you to a professor at Ga Tech who will argue this one with you. With rare ex; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00588.html (10,649 bytes)
46. Re: [TowerTalk] RF exposure and my neighbor (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:17:50 +0000; NØRQ added: You might mention that his microwave oven could be a much greater concern -- and if you're so inclined, buy a microwave leak detector and let him borrow it -- it would show your co; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00624.html (9,862 bytes)
47. [TowerTalk] Re: Replying to the list...AGAIN! (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 01:01:48 +0000; The headers from a recent digest: From: towertalk-request@contesting.com Subject: TowerTalk Digest, Vol 19, Issue 75 To: towertalk@contesting.com Reply-To: towertalk@contesting.com X-BeenThere: tower; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00731.html (7,262 bytes)
48. [TowerTalk] Re: TowerTalk Digest, Vol 20, Issue 62 (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 15:12:57 +0000; Wonder if the list server is clever enough to be configured should any of this: Or more than one instance of: or this: or this: That the post goes straight into the bit bucket? Please folks, look at; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00442.html (8,203 bytes)
49. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower costs (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 23:43:22 +0000; NV8A asked after W4ZW described his roof tower installation: How do you (generic "you") know what loads your roof will stand? How can you be sure that a good strong wind -- 60mph, 80mph -- won't take; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00513.html (9,681 bytes)
50. Re: [TowerTalk] geo888 (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 22:51:08 +0000; K9YC correctly pointed out: No, it's not a virus. It's a former member of the list who no longer has an AOL account. Looks like geo888 didn't subscribe to the digest, as I'm seeing nothing but others; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00498.html (7,514 bytes)
51. Re: [TowerTalk] geo888 (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 23:48:10 +0000; Errr, just got something back from my post. Seems we can solve this by not posting anything to the list. ;^) K9YC correctly pointed out: No, it's not a virus. It's a former member of the list who no; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00503.html (7,797 bytes)
52. Re: [TowerTalk] ARR Preamp Failures (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 02:39:13 +0000; Oh boy - plenty to read in the digest this morning... A preamp designed for being used mounted at the mast, but is not, looks kind of like incorrect use of the product, though one may think it okay.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00102.html (8,686 bytes)
53. Re: [TowerTalk] new Steppir antenna (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 23:00:27 +0000; N6RK replied to W6RMK: I wanted to modify a 2 element SteppIR Yagi (the regular one) for 30 meters (as a dipole). Since I would be running only 100 watts, the voltage was "only" a coupla thousand vol; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00104.html (8,828 bytes)
54. Re: [TowerTalk] 2 element 40m steppir yagi (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 23:14:14 +0000; K7PUC asked: Have I totally misjudged Towertalkians interest? Apparently. So here's one that apparently folks here are interested in: 100m of #12 wire in HK is about $300. But there was a good one in; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00123.html (9,008 bytes)
55. Re: [TowerTalk] Double shield (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 03:39:51 +0000; W8JI brought a smile to my face with: OK, I'll bite on this hook. What is the reason everyone likes double shielded cable so much? As he clearly was thinking what I was thinking & the reasons given r; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00274.html (7,605 bytes)
56. Re: [TowerTalk] Double shield (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:29:52 +0000; W6RMK (I think it was) continued: Big difference between woven braid and perforated surfaces as far as EM propagation goes... Yes, the holes in the mesh are like WG past cutoff, but there's no conduc; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00283.html (9,590 bytes)
57. Re: [TowerTalk] Shields (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 23:33:51 +0000; WB2WIK/6 added: Actually, in my experience using hardline or 100% (or at least very good double) shielded cables in VHF-UHF repeater systems and cavity interconnects in duplexers does make a differen; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00323.html (8,943 bytes)
58. [TowerTalk] Rectangular loops (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 23:59:07 +0000; Is the silly season on TT over yet? Here's one that I'd appreciate some help on. Due to termination of employment, I had to move into cheaper accommodation, swapping a good horizon & nearby salt wate; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00359.html (9,769 bytes)
59. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: BPL (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 03:01:08 +0000; KR7X asked: Just what does this thread have to do with Towers and the installation of amateur radio stations, especially when it drifts to political agendas of those posting?? Lets get back to the fo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00379.html (8,165 bytes)
60. Re: [TowerTalk] Rectangular loops (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 00:46:56 +0000; W8JI replied: bottom of the loop like 40-j160 (with j the loop is across 30. think I can put two of my balcony on the Are you placing the tuner right at the antenna, or at the end of a long feedline?; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00407.html (9,127 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]