Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w7vp@comcast.net: 39 ]

Total 39 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Mast wind loading (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:38:14 -0800
Norm Replying to your post is difficult. There may be others on this forum who can reply more effectively than I can but let me pass on some thoughts. First of all the Rohn guyed tower specification
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-03/msg00538.html (10,519 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Wind loading comment misdirected? W7VP (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:13:21 -0800
Yes Jim and I wish I could get my aerodynamics students to see it beyond that level of simplicity. Indeed the coefficient of drag will increase rapidly when there is boundary layer separation, which
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-03/msg00559.html (10,630 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Wind loading comment misdirected? W7VP (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 21:44:16 -0800
Jim The non-linear character of the numbers you have chosen are characteristics of the so-called "drag bucket." Note in the description of the calculator that the author has used a parabolic algorith
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-03/msg00567.html (17,492 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Mast wind loading (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:33:15 -0800
I guess I see it partly the same and partly differently Jim. Risk analysis incorporates more than just the person building the tower, which is why the manufacturers specify the limits of their design
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-03/msg00603.html (15,635 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower power (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 13:43:40 -0800
Those things are great for field day ops Gene. You can hang a couple of slabs of ribs in the field and have a great barbeque . The "ether" in the atmosphere helps to tenderize the meat and sets the s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00012.html (9,109 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Phasing verticals and stubs (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 06:26:19 -0700
Hi Guys Can you explain the "right triangle." My understanding is that the three are in an equilateral triangle (60 degrees between each antenna). Bill W7VP __________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00099.html (10,713 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] Phased Verticals (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 06:54:53 -0700
Another source for phased vertical information is in a Telex-HyGain Engineering report entitled "Phased Multi-Band Verticals for Additional Gain and Low Angle Radiation." The report is undated but co
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00100.html (7,624 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Phasing verticals and stubs (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 10:58:59 -0700
Don: What you are describing sounds like simply two 2-antenna systems placed 90 degrees to each other where on of the antennas is common to both. I conclude that from your statement that there are 4
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00110.html (12,785 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Phased Verticals (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 18:54:16 -0700
Which design are you referring to Tor? Bill W7VP -- Original Message -- From: <rt_clay@bellsouth.net> To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 11:30 AM Subject: Re: [TowerTalk]
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00123.html (9,003 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] No Explanation (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 07:30:25 -0700
Tor N4OGW Stated "Also note that the phasing for the cardioid array shown in that report is incorrect. You can't just add a "delay" line of 1/4 wavelength to get 90 degree phasing." and "Two vertical
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00133.html (6,996 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] rotor removal question (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 07:42:18 -0700
For only 200# Try this. Bolt a muffler clamp a few inches from the rotator. Then hook one end of a loading strap (the kind with the ratchets) to a tower rung a couple feet above the clamp and wrap th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00244.html (13,703 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] mismatch at feed, ok at transmiter (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 08:15:14 -0700
Jim Nice explanation Feedpoint matching is a big problem for most of us amateur designers. I have had a big 20 meter yagi for more than 30 years. It came as a Bill Orr type design with 4 elements equ
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00245.html (14,114 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] mismatch at feed, ok at transmiter (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 09:57:37 -0700
Gary I have not tried to measure it and so far I have only anecdotal experience. It will take time to see the true difference. Nevertheless the difference in a mid level signal is very noticeable aur
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00251.html (9,569 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotor Location (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 11:09:29 -0700
Roger It is true that the tower acts as a torsion bar in the high rotor configuration. The extent that the tower deflects and acts as a damper (what is the source of the damping?) will depend on the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00256.html (12,045 bytes)

15. [TowerTalk] RC5-3 Problem (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 10:06:31 -0700
My RC5-3 just quit indicating but the preset knob still turns the beam to the correct position. Any thoughts? Bill W7VP _______________________________________________ _______________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00326.html (6,275 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] Calculating dead weight stress on mast when toweriscranked over (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 14:29:59 -0700
The formula is sigma (stress in lb/sq.in) = m ( moment) times c (distance from centroid) divided by I (area moment of intertia). The moment is 10500 in-lbs. The distance from the centroid is 1 inch a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-05/msg00494.html (10,303 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] Downward Mast Extensions (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2006 17:36:18 -0700
Gene I am not sure what you mean by a "moment force." There is both a moment and a force involved. The force is the combination of all the arrays with the wind load calculated. It is applied at the t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00065.html (13,067 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] Action against US Tower? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 06:58:52 -0700
You are very right JC, although they are probably more damned if they don't. As a manufacturer they are subject to court developed law called "manufacturer's strict liability." Under that law they ar
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00085.html (11,949 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] Action against US Tower? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 14:32:27 -0700
Right on Jim! Note that the disclaimer of warranties is not valid against a tort claim. It is intended to avoid liability under contract theory for violation of the promises made relating to the prod
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00103.html (14,035 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] Action against US Tower? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 22:49:52 -0700
I guess that is because I am an engineer too, Jim :-) 73 Bill W7VP -- Original Message -- From: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net> To: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>; <wc1m@msn.com>; "'JC Smith'" <jc-smith@
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00108.html (12,738 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu