Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w7why@verizon.net: 332 ]

Total 332 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TowerTalk] Phasing verticals and stubs (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 17:42:07 -0700
Yes, I meant they are in an equilateral triangle. Had a brain fart. Lots of postings on this subject, but nobody has yet answered my original question. I'll post it again. I have 2 stubs, separtated
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00121.html (14,053 bytes)

62. Re: [TowerTalk] Phasing verticals and stubs (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 20:14:12 -0700
For interstation interference reduction Tuned to the CW part of 40 I have a line from my rig to a stub, 1/4 line to the next stub, then to the antenna Tom W7WHY ______________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00124.html (17,010 bytes)

63. Re: [TowerTalk] Phasing verticals and stubs (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 17:15:54 -0700
Hi Gary Yep, they are on the line between the transmitter and the "T" fitting to the network. I tried them out last night (with 2 of the 3 verticals) and didn't seem to make much difference in the SW
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00147.html (9,054 bytes)

64. Re: [TowerTalk] 10 - 40 Beam (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2006 21:36:32 -0700
Hi Rex Well, it all depends on the thickness of the elements. 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list Tower
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00183.html (7,025 bytes)

65. Re: [TowerTalk] Upgrading from Rohn 25 to 45 (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 17:21:55 -0700
You get Houdini to do the tower work. 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com htt
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00265.html (7,783 bytes)

66. Re: [TowerTalk] close spaced 4 square? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 18:50:33 -0700
_______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00425.html (7,417 bytes)

67. Re: [TowerTalk] Self-Righting Tower (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 18:00:49 -0700
Gives a new meaning to a retractable tower :-) Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.co
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-05/msg00051.html (7,185 bytes)

68. Re: [TowerTalk] why not regalvanize? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 20:14:11 -0700
Some of the products on the market, like Ospho, really work good on rust, but the problem is that as long as there is rust, it will keep working. It can eat all the way through some pretty hefty meta
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-05/msg00059.html (8,569 bytes)

69. [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 19:12:16 -0700
Hi All I have 3 phased verticals for 40 and an inverted "L" for 160. At the base of each of these, I have a pretty extensive radial system. I run a wire from the radials at the base of each antenna t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-05/msg00120.html (6,480 bytes)

70. Re: [TowerTalk] [SCCC] SteppIr's are BEAUTIFUL!!!! (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 17:20:53 -0700
Yeah, either that or get them into the hobby :-) 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesti
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-05/msg00216.html (9,817 bytes)

71. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIr's suck (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:40:01 -0700
Same here in Coos Bay, OR. If you think the farm stuff smells bad, how about shrimp shells and crab shells :-) Here the farmers take the residue from the fish plants and put that on their fields. Sm
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-05/msg00236.html (8,490 bytes)

72. [TowerTalk] Using a crane (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 17:44:06 -0700
All well and good if you can get to the tower. If I used a crane to put the antennas on my tower, I would have to remove the house to get it back there Tom W7WHY _____________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-05/msg00313.html (7,316 bytes)

73. Re: [TowerTalk] The simple Gamma Match? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 17:51:10 -0700
Hi Dino Click on this link http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=%22gamma+match%22 Found a bunch of stuff on google on gamma matching. One looks pretty good using 2 pieces of aluminum tubing and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-05/msg00315.html (6,892 bytes)

74. Re: [TowerTalk] The simple Gamma Match? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 17:58:40 -0700
If you want to make it really easy, and work good, change it to 2 elements, space the elements about 1/4 wave (with split driven element that is) and it's 50 ohms. Feed it with coax and go. Make a gr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-05/msg00353.html (8,729 bytes)

75. Re: [TowerTalk] [WISPA FCC] OT??? High power 2.4 GHz rules change (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 18:19:35 -0700
I don't have a clue what this means, or what it has to do with antennas. Guess I'm dumb or something. 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ ___________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-05/msg00372.html (8,296 bytes)

76. Re: [TowerTalk] Liberal Arts Question on Dipole Antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 17:28:08 -0700
Hi Lee I think if you are not using a balun, the length of coax will make a big difference in the SWR. You might try adding a chunk of coax and see if it changes the antenna. I have a couple of ante
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00030.html (8,660 bytes)

77. [TowerTalk] Helically wound verticals (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2006 14:44:23 -0700
Hi All Some years back, there was an article, I believe in QST, about some vertical antennas wound on 2 pieces of pvc pipe. They were for 40, 30 and 20. The bottom section was wound for 30/40 and you
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00056.html (7,386 bytes)

78. Re: [TowerTalk] Action against US Tower? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 20:02:25 -0700
Huh, wonder where you got that? Go to http://se.cessna.com/ and they have a complete line of piston powered airplanes. This is a quote about the Skylane: "The Skylane is acknowledged as the best all
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00177.html (9,687 bytes)

79. [TowerTalk] Action against US Towers? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 20:07:53 -0700
Oops, missed that line--sorry about that Bill My dyslixia kicking up again Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00178.html (6,438 bytes)

80. [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 21:50:21 -0700
Hi all Going to put up a 40/20 (probably use the 40 on 15) multiband vertical for field day. Do they work better with 1/4 radials for each band, or would 1/4 wave radials for 40 work on 20 OK? 73 Tom
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00240.html (6,303 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu