Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w9ac@arrl.net: 391 ]

Total 391 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TowerTalk] exploding foundations (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 10:33:46 -0400
What exploding concrete?? Back up your claim with real life validated proof. My experience has been the opposite. Doug Want evidence? See Figure 4 (and the text below it) in the link below: http://ww
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00486.html (8,665 bytes)

42. Re: [TowerTalk] PL-259's can be installed correctly in 5 minutes (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:19:39 -0400
Good suggestion. I use a can of silicone spray lubricant and apply it to the jacket. Electrical properties are good and this keeps the jacket from twisting and deforming while screwing the connector
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00248.html (9,797 bytes)

43. Re: [TowerTalk] High voltage transmission lines (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 15:43:08 -0400
I live 800 feet from a parallel feed of three 345KV lines. I'm a low-band operator and for the past seven years at this QTH, the noise level from the lines has varied from slight to deafening, depen
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00505.html (9,507 bytes)

44. Re: [TowerTalk] High voltage transmission lines (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 16:53:39 -0400
The issue is not the FCC's authority over the subject matter but the potential impact to the public at large. While the FCC can levy a fine, the claim would not stand an injunctive action to compel
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00512.html (8,430 bytes)

45. [TowerTalk] RG-58 Cable Preparation (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 09:14:54 -0500
I am looking for input regarding the type of cable preparation tool should I should use to prepare RG-58 cable for installation of a PL-259 connector and UG-type reducer. Actually, I will be using RG
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-02/msg00070.html (7,966 bytes)

46. Re: [TowerTalk] Full body harness (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 12:55:37 -0400
Probably the most important item at the time of order is an intangible that cannot be purchased on-line: Proper training and use of the harness. I am amazed at the number of folks who will purchase
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00024.html (7,437 bytes)

47. Re: [TowerTalk] Full body harness - Law Suits?? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 16:06:58 -0400
The League should not (and likely will not) render legal advice unless there's an established attorney-client relationship. They may put you in touch with one of their volunteer counsel, but this is
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00031.html (10,481 bytes)

48. [TowerTalk] Barker & Williamson (E.F. Johnson) HDVL-HDCL-HDA Coil Sets (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:07:29 -0500
As part of a link-coupled tuner project, I need any of the above B&W "HD" series coil sets (e.g., 80 HDVL, 40 HDCL, 80 HDA, etc.) in any condition so long as the base insulator and jack pins are inta
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00273.html (7,265 bytes)

49. Re: [TowerTalk] Old Safety Belt (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:20:43 -0500
CQ Contest magazine for a total of over 10 years. I'm hoping to reprint all of them in an upcoming book." Wow. At a minimum, I would ensure that a disclaimer is conspicuously posted in each and ever
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00071.html (8,643 bytes)

50. Re: [TowerTalk] Old Safety Belt (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 18:01:20 -0500
No doubt, but the climbing and rigging of a tower inherently has greater risk (e.g., propensity for fatality) than DIY articles on say...woodworking -- although I know of some skilled carpenters wit
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00086.html (8,832 bytes)

51. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical vs Yagi (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 12:49:21 -0400
David, Bill, W4ZV referenced this effect early in the discussion: "This problem has to do with something called magnetic coupling (or polarization) loss. This primarily affects 160m which is closest
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00130.html (7,221 bytes)

52. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical vs Yagi (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:03:01 -0400
David, It was actually part of the side-bar discussion presently running under "EZNEC Needs Improvement." Paul, W9AC -- Original Message -- From: David Gilbert To: Paul Christensen Cc: TowerTalk Sent
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00137.html (8,552 bytes)

53. Re: [TowerTalk] Hardline ? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:46:56 -0400
"The SWR is determined by the load at the end of the line, and don't you forget it". I believe that line came from "My Feed Line Tunes My Antenna!" a classic article by Byron Goodman, W1DX (QST, Mar.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00561.html (8,354 bytes)

54. Re: [TowerTalk] Hardline ? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:48:57 -0400
The arithmetic mean between 30-ohms (best power handling) and 77-ohms (lowest loss) is 53.5, the geometric mean is 48 ohms. The historical choice of 50-ohms represents a compromise between maximizing
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00562.html (8,290 bytes)

55. Re: [TowerTalk] Hardline ? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 22:09:54 -0400
The "additional loss" is a function of line VSWR and is added to the matched line loss. For example, consider a 100-foot length of transmission line that according to the manufacturer's spec sheet e
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00578.html (10,780 bytes)

56. Re: [TowerTalk] Hardline ? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 22:49:53 -0400
The additional loss can generally be ignored with low-to-moderate amounts of matched line loss and moderate line VSWR. To demonstrate the additional line loss effect, compare two different feed syst
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00580.html (9,786 bytes)

57. Re: [TowerTalk] Ladderline. What Kind ? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:26:35 -0400
Great story and it's just as relevant today: I found a large stash of the same Johnson ceramic insulators and was a bit perplexed as to why they had notches on the outside. I was about to route the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00684.html (8,997 bytes)

58. Re: [TowerTalk] LADDER LINE (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:54:53 -0400
Back in the '30s, open feeder lines were taken very seriously. Take a look at the article below and the insulators Collins once sold for 1/4-inch copper tubing, The combination of tubing and their c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00687.html (8,095 bytes)

59. Re: [TowerTalk] Amphenol PL259 (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 21:03:16 -0400
Jorge: Both the Amphenol 83-1SP (standard) and Amphenol 083-822 (silver/Teflon) are excellent. I generally order 083-822 from Mouser: http://www.mouser.com/catalog/638/1168.pdf I don't believe Amphen
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00052.html (8,562 bytes)

60. Re: [TowerTalk] Amphenol PL259 (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 22:54:37 -0400
K8RI: > In all my years I have never seen any one attach a reducer like that. Roger, in all your years, you must have seen this procedure in the ARRL Antenna Book and ARRL Handbook. A sample of the t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00054.html (8,263 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu