Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wa2ndp@combase.com: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Problem W/First Call Communications (score: 1)
Author: wa2ndp@combase.com (DAN MANFRE)
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 10:48:38 -0500
About a month ago, I posted this message on Tower Talk. I am sure that since that time, more Hams have subscribed. So, in order to keep the Amateur Radio Community abreast of QUESTIONABLE BUSINESS PR
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00050.html (9,766 bytes)

2. (Fwd) Re: [TowerTalk] Problem W/First Call Communications (score: 1)
Author: wa2ndp@combase.com (DAN MANFRE)
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 13:03:47 -0500
Jim, With regards to your last email. 1) I do NOT consider myself to be a "fool" like the other gentleman with his Mosley antenna problem! 2) My only intent was to inform NEW people on the reflector
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00130.html (10,258 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Problem w/First Call Communications (score: 1)
Author: wa2ndp@combase.com (d)
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 19:53:09 -0500
I am also one of the Hams who has been scammed by First Call Communications. Here is what happened to me. DAN, WA2NDP -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk Submissions: towertalk@con
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00486.html (7,937 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] Problem W/First Call Communications (score: 1)
Author: wa2ndp@combase.com (d)
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 21:08:16 -0500
I am one of the HAMS that was scammed by First Call Communications. Here is what happened. DAN, WA2NDP I am writing this to alert the Amateur Radio Community to the questionable business practices of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00488.html (10,267 bytes)

5. Re[2]: [TowerTalk] RE: [Tower Talk] Tri-Ex (score: 1)
Author: wa2ndp@combase.com (d)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 16:23:47 -0500
Knowing the people, process and product at Will-Burt, I know they will produce a quality product as long as there is a market and it is profitable for them to do so. The real question is whether Firs
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00547.html (9,938 bytes)

6. Re[2]: [TowerTalk] RE: [Tower Talk] Tri-Ex (score: 1)
Author: wa2ndp@combase.com (d)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 20:40:32 -0500
Why in the world would any successful company in their right mind want to deal directly with hams???? -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Admi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00551.html (11,196 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] set the record straight (score: 1)
Author: wa2ndp@combase.com (d)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 18:50:34 -0500
Joel, If you want to set the record straight then please explain to me why my tower was NOT shipped during the third (3rd) WEEK OF OCTOBER 2000? That's when it was completed. Also, why haven't you re
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00574.html (15,141 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] set the record straight (score: 1)
Author: wa2ndp@combase.com (d)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 09:29:25 -0500
Mike, It is NOT the quality or worksmanship of the tower that we are all concerned with. The main concern is the questionable business practices of First Call Communications (Joel)! Can't you see the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00598.html (19,309 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu