Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wa3afs@inav.net: 50 ]

Total 50 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] re coax jumpers help (score: 1)
Author: wa3afs@inav.net
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:22:02 -0500
I have been running 600-700 watts into RG8X regularly for many years. 160M-10M. My coax runs now exceed 150 feet to my phased 160M verticals and 40M 4-square. Never had a problem with the power handl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00572.html (12,814 bytes)

22. Re: [TowerTalk] Full Wave Loop Through Trees (score: 1)
Author: wa3afs@inav.net
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 17:10:47 -0500
I use a compound bow and arrow (fishing arrow since it has a nice hole in the rear of the arrow and I also place a screw-on BNC connector on the front of the arrow as a weight) to put up my coaxial i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00679.html (9,160 bytes)

23. Re: [TowerTalk] Copper wire prices (score: 1)
Author: wa3afs@inav.net
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:23:51 -0500
I have used RG6 (and other 'scrap' coax) for some of my ground radials (with the center conductor and shield connected together at the base plate). I have trained my electrons to travel on the outer
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00426.html (9,219 bytes)

24. Re: [TowerTalk] radial wire (score: 1)
Author: wa3afs@inav.net
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:09:35 -0500
Copper clad steel may be rather difficult to work with for radial wires. It has a memory that does not give up! I had a long wire (200 feet or so) antenna (number 12?) that I had up for about 2-3 yea
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00453.html (8,478 bytes)

25. Re: [TowerTalk] Need HF Vertical opinions... (score: 1)
Author: wa3afs@inav.net
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 14:06:59 -0500
I second the response suggesting the Big SteppIR. I put one up as my first antenna after moving to this QTH and was extremely satisfied. I did attach about 8 radials cut to each band along with the s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00697.html (8,877 bytes)

26. Re: [TowerTalk] QRN during the rain (score: 1)
Author: wa3afs@inav.net
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 06:51:56 -0500
DO NOT HIT A POWER POLE WITH A SLEDGE HAMMER!!!! There could be lose hardware which can fall on you! Potentally a very dangerous action. Suggest you go to the RFI reflector and get assistance from th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00366.html (9,830 bytes)

27. Re: [TowerTalk] Pictures of Soldering a PL-259 (UHF Male) at K3LR (score: 1)
Author: wa3afs@inav.net
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 18:44:31 -0500
For those that still prefer to use the solder holes for the shield on a PL-259, I use a small tool with a slight hook at the end to grab pieces of the shield and pull them up through the holes so tha
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00650.html (9,921 bytes)

28. [TowerTalk] Short Beverage?? (score: 1)
Author: wa3afs@inav.net
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 22:36:38 -0500
I am new to the beverage world... I built and installed a 540 foot beverage (about 7 feet above ground in a more or less straight path among the trees. I am not pointing at True North!). Results were
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00216.html (7,929 bytes)

29. Re: [TowerTalk] 40 meter vertical ant (score: 1)
Author: wa3afs@inav.net
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 22:52:28 -0500
If you have the space -- 2 verticals phased work very well. I have used two coaxial inverted L's (actually they were almost entirely vertical) phased at my previous two QTHs with very nice results. (
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00188.html (7,908 bytes)

30. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1)
Author: wa3afs@inav.net
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:36:39 -0500
Over the years I found that the larger the diameter the better for radials. When I was a lot younger (ham years, that is), and I was experimenting with my first verticals (coaxial inverted Ls on 160,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00208.html (8,526 bytes)

31. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials looped instead of Soldered? (score: 1)
Author: wa3afs@inav.net
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 12:57:12 -0400
I have looped my radial connections, crimped, and soldered. Very occassionally I had to retighten some of the looped connections (Maybe once or twice a year). (I always used lock washers) Currently I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00598.html (9,633 bytes)

32. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1)
Author: wa3afs@inav.net
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 07:00:26 -0400
I have used old coax for radials. at the connection point to the vertical, I short the inner conductor to the shield. Works great. I have experiemented with using different types of wire for radials
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00615.html (8,364 bytes)

33. Re: [TowerTalk] Wilson TT-45 (score: 1)
Author: wa3afs@inav.net
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 07:04:16 -0400
I had a Wilson TT-45 for about 15 years (1978 - 1995) with a Wilson SY-36 on it along with a large 2M colinear. Never had any problems. I think the beam weighed about 57 pounds. I believe the tower a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00616.html (8,123 bytes)

34. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1)
Author: wa3afs@inav.net
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 12:35:14 -0400
I have seen many 'posts' about the size of the radials. But, I stand behind my results at 3 different QTHs (two in NY, one in Iowa). I count results as being able to consistently work DX! The only su
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00620.html (12,516 bytes)

35. Re: [TowerTalk] Question about force 12 c-4 (score: 1)
Author: wa3afs@inav.net
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 14:39:26 -0400
I had a C-4 up for about 10 years (in Iowa). When I built the antenna, I wrapped the fiberglass insulators in good quality electrical tape. When I took the antenna down the insulators looked in very
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00185.html (8,730 bytes)

36. Re: [TowerTalk] step away from stepIR (score: 1)
Author: wa3afs@inav.net
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:30:18 -0400
Although we all have a right to our opinions, for me I have found that the SteppIR beam (3 element in my case) has far outperformed my previous 2 beams. I like the ability to of the beam to play well
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00270.html (8,731 bytes)

37. [TowerTalk] (Fwd) Re: Gotham antenna (score: 1)
Author: wa3afs@inav.net
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:53:25 -0400
I bought one of the Gotham "gutless wonders" and installed it in November of 1978. If I remember correctly, it was a vertical which I wanted to use to get on 160M and I paid $29.95 (shipping included
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00380.html (10,525 bytes)

38. Re: [TowerTalk] 4 x Square Question (score: 1)
Author: wa3afs@inav.net
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 19:18:23 -0400
I have done it both ways. No difference for snagging dx. Probably, the ground rod might help in lightning situations. -- Bruce, WA3AFS _______________________________________________ ________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00816.html (8,113 bytes)

39. Re: [TowerTalk] 160M inverted L (score: 1)
Author: <wa3afs@inav.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 21:11:03 +0000
From My experience with 3 different sets of 160M coaxial inverted Ls, I found that in general the higher the vertical component, the better the antenna will perform for dx. My first and 3rd sets (I u
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00861.html (8,457 bytes)

40. Re: [TowerTalk] Recommendations for 6M,2M HF antenna stacked over F12 C3SS TRIBAND (score: 1)
Author: wa3afs@inav.net
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 23:09:12 -0400
At my previous QTH, I had a Force-12 C4 with a Cushcraft A627013S (6 Meter/2 Meter/70 CM Triband Antenna) mounted about a foot or two below the C4 and fairly close to the thrust bearing. The combinat
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00134.html (9,390 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu