Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wa3afs@inav.net: 50 ]

Total 50 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TowerTalk] RFI reflector? (score: 1)
Author: wa3afs@inav.net
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 16:30:40 -0400
rfi-request@contesting.com 73, Bruce, WA3AFS _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lis
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00420.html (8,195 bytes)

42. Re: [TowerTalk] Climbing a Glen Martin RT1832 roof tower (score: 1)
Author: wa3afs@inav.net
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 10:51:11 -0400
I would tie (very securely in several places--for stability) a ladder to one of the sides. This would allow a lot of the downward forces to be distributed between the roof and the tower. I have the G
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00703.html (8,519 bytes)

43. Re: [TowerTalk] 40 meter 4 Square recommendations/observations (score: 1)
Author: wa3afs@inav.net
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 20:58:49 -0400
I have had extensive experience with ground mounted inverted Ls and verticals on 160M, 80M, and 40M since the early 80s at 3 different QTHs. I presently have a pair of inverted Ls on 160, a pair on i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00802.html (9,263 bytes)

44. Re: [TowerTalk] FW: Crank Up towers (score: 1)
Author: wa3afs@inav.net
Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2007 20:05:19 -0400
When I had a crank-up/tilt over tower (Wilson 45 foot), I would tilt the tower (lowered!) over a 10 foot sawhorse (rather unwieldy to set up but with two people quite easy!) and then used a 12 foot '
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00016.html (14,253 bytes)

45. Re: [TowerTalk] Green Power Lightbulb QRN (score: 1)
Author: wa3afs@inav.net
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 09:55:30 -0400
Check out smarthome.com. They have a lot of neat (but pricey) items including a dimmable CFL. I have bought a couple of their items (but have not tried the dimmable CFL yet. ) I do have a lot of CFLs
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00880.html (9,430 bytes)

46. Re: [TowerTalk] 160-m. Inverted L Question (score: 1)
Author: wa3afs@inav.net
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:11:28 -0500
I use coaxial inverted Ls. Direct feed and no tuner needed if feeding a single coaxial inverted L. (I phase multiple inverted Ls and that does require a tuner). The coaxial inverted L does require ra
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-12/msg00211.html (9,710 bytes)

47. Re: [TowerTalk] Phasing Question (score: 1)
Author: wa3afs@inav.net
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 07:55:20 -0500
I used to phase a pair of coaxial inverted Ls (a pair on 160m, a pair on 75m, and a pair on 40m). I did the following: 1. The feedlines to each antenna had to be the same length. Each antenna was sep
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00090.html (8,969 bytes)

48. Re: [TowerTalk] Another radial question (score: 1)
Author: "Bruce/Edith Goldstein" <wa3afs@inav.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 21:44:02 -0500
I have done exactly as you describe. Seems to work very good. I use every piece of wire I can get me hands on for radials....old RG6, RG8, RG58, multiconductor cables, etc. Yes, I short the shield to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00553.html (8,653 bytes)

49. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 c-3 information (score: 1)
Author: "Bruce/Edith Goldstein" <wa3afs@inav.net>
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2008 11:12:35 -0500
I had the C4 (which is a c-3 with the 40M element) up for 10 years when I lived in Iowa. I wrapped all the fiberglass with Scotch 88 electrical tape. When I took it down after ten years, the fibergla
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00088.html (8,498 bytes)

50. Re: [TowerTalk] 6M Beam (score: 1)
Author: "Bruce/Edith Goldstein" <wa3afs@inav.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:07:13 -0500
I have used a Cushcraft A627013S (3 els on 6m, 5 on 2M, and 5 on 440). Two feedlines used. Too bad you are not close to my QTH (near Albany, NY); I am trying to sell this antenna as I do not have roo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00665.html (8,877 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu