Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wa9als@starband.net: 77 ]

Total 77 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Looking for jfolk (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Tue Aug 5 21:56:28 2003
jfolk asked me some questions about my tower today and I managed to lose his email - something similar to jfolk@rr.com, but that's not quite it. Can Jeff or anyone else help? tnx
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-08/msg00166.html (6,326 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Local noon calculator (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Thu Aug 14 14:25:59 2003
To program Dave, that link came out as a LOCAL reference. COuld you try the URL again?
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-08/msg00524.html (6,909 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Help with antenna (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Sun Aug 17 13:28:25 2003
C31XR (With T2X) for 4 Indiana winters now - not a problem. SWR same great numbers as the day it went up at 72 ft. Nothing has fallen off or become loose. No WARC bands, but that was OK with me. NO T
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-08/msg00608.html (9,572 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] Help with antenna (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Sun Aug 17 13:29:41 2003
data sets, HREF="http://www.championradio.com">www.championradio.com</A>. See a I recommend getting that report. The C31XR came out pretty good in that, as I recall.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-08/msg00609.html (8,096 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] Help with antenna (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Sun Aug 17 13:34:21 2003
I should've mention F:B. The C31XR has such good gain and F:B, that I find myself rotating it a fair amount during contests. If it's on EU and a 100W W6 or northern W7 calls me in Indiana, sometimes
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-08/msg00610.html (8,601 bytes)

6. [Towertalk] Am I alone ? (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 15:56:41 -0500
FYI - I have Norton AV 2002 here at work and another AV system at home, and I'm not getting any viruses. GL figuring it out. 73
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00000.html (6,917 bytes)

7. [Towertalk] Best Tribander for DX and Contesting....by price (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 10:04:51 -0500
-covering every frequency, 20M to 6M, with a VSWR of 1:1. Check it out at, steppIRYagi@aol.com 73, Carl VE9OV -- I have a can of oil that does the same thing! ;-) Any plans to test the SteppIR Steve?
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00676.html (7,725 bytes)

8. [Towertalk] To MSN eShop (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (wa9als)
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 15:20:38 -0400
-- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts -- multipart/alternative text/html audio/x-midi application/octet-stream -- StripMime Errors -- A message with no text/plain section was received. The enti
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00081.html (6,438 bytes)

9. WINPROXY didn't stop KLEZ! was Re: [Towertalk] Klez (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 05:47:16 -0500
I have no idea what all the KLEZ posts have to do with towers, but I have to comment on WINPROXY due to recent reassuring messages! SRI off topic Steve, but you have allowed the virus posts so far,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00173.html (11,013 bytes)

10. [Towertalk] Lightning Protection by Ron Block in QST! (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 18:31:24 -0500
In June 2002 QST, page 56, Part 1, by Ron Block, and reviewed for technical accuracy by Roger. Some interesting things, including a map and chart from which you can find the number of predicted light
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00348.html (7,817 bytes)

11. [Towertalk] Dayton Attendence (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 14:36:43 -0500
Well, I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm unsubscribing and depressed with the state of human relations, not to mention ham radio in general. I found Dayton really fun and inspiring. The -tal
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00536.html (11,383 bytes)

12. [Towertalk] Here's the TOWER hat photo (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 08:32:52 -0500
Since I haven't been unable to unsubscribe yet, I'll can leave you with this gift - a photo of the ultimate TOWER mount! Look closely at http://www.qsl.net/wa9als/Dayton_2002/106-0695_IMG.JPG Sorry
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00562.html (7,175 bytes)

13. [Towertalk] The Ham Radio Business (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 14:38:30 -0500
I think the average ham is expanding, not shrinking! I got my son through CW-tech. However, when he turns through the bands and finds racial slurs, profanity, and nude photos on SSTV, I have to wond
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00018.html (9,242 bytes)

14. [Towertalk] PW-1 SO-239 discoloration (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 08:37:30 -0500
Much of the time I have PL-259 connections to SO-239 connectors 1 and 4 of my PW-1's antenna switch. When I'm contesting, I usually also have PL-259s attached to 2 and 3. Is it normal for the SO-239s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00214.html (7,303 bytes)

15. [Towertalk] END OF THREAD - Re: [Icom] PW-1 SO-239 discoloration (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 14:54:51 -0500
brownish Thanks for all the comments. I'm well aware of nickel and silver PL-259s, and always use the silver. However, I just hadn't noticed SO-239s browning like these have, where uncovered. Maybe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00227.html (7,617 bytes)

16. [Towertalk] Web Site (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 21:43:25 -0500
It worked earlier tonight for me. Must be ISP prob? Try agn later - neat photos and setups!! there
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00448.html (8,491 bytes)

17. [Towertalk] covering unused PL259 ? de n9vv (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 12:23:05 -0500
Why not use "coax seal"? (Best stuff available, of course!) That should work perfectly for that purpose. also up to tape
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00535.html (9,459 bytes)

18. [Towertalk] covering unused PL259 ? CoaxSeal NO (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 18:33:02 -0500
Notice the quotation marks and the phrase "best stuff available" above. "Commercial grade" vapor wrap" - I also assumed this is what is sold by Champion, right? I've removed this stuff by using a po
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00554.html (7,770 bytes)

19. [Towertalk] Cable purchase source info requested (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 07:22:38 -0500
Many installations are unique. I had about a 600 ft run, and despite much trying, I couldn't find any free CATV hardline. I had to spring for some LMR600DB. Over the run, I had to cross a small strea
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00638.html (10,415 bytes)

20. [Towertalk] Tower lightning protection tutorial? (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 20:32:34 -0500
Uh, how about http://www.polyphaser.com/ppc_technical.asp, and within there, http://www.polyphaser.com/datasheets/PTD1016.pdf, among others.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00663.html (7,513 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu