Mail Archive Search: <+from:wb4mle@surfbest.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:wb4mle@surfbest.net: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower base hole? (score: 1): Author: wb4mle@surfbest.net; Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2003 13:29:15 -0400; Don't forget about the local sign erectors. Many of them have "rigs" that can auger to 10'+ depth and then use the boom/crane to position your rebar cages exactly. Some of them have 100' class perso; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00206.html (8,757 bytes)
2. Re: [towertalk] Permits (score: 1): Author: wb4mle@surfbest.net; Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 23:56:02 -00; An acceptable alternative to CYA may be to apply for a permit with complete plot plan (approximately to scale with ACCURATE distances shown) and description of tower/anchors/bases. A copy of this ap; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00201.html (6,935 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Towertalk mail problem (score: 1): Author: wb4mle@surfbest.net; Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:26:12 -0500; For some reason. the contesting.com domain mail addresses(towertalk and rfi) are being blocked from the SurfBest smtp.SFB4.net smtp handler. I just moved to the SurfBest SFB14.net and am testing to s; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00232.html (6,948 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] CDE HAM II Rotor . . . another question (score: 1): Author: wb4mle@surfbest.net; Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 13:16:54 -0400; Have the exact same situation with a Ham IV. Problem is a binding meter coil. If you adjust the mechanical zero to the opposite side it is now (turn adj. screw 180 degrees), it may clear the coil bi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00585.html (8,862 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]