Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wc1m@msn.com: 276 ]

Total 276 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [TowerTalk] MA550 Tubular Tower Binding. (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 13:33:31 -0400
Ron, I had binding problems with my MA-770MDP with the rotating base. The primary culprit was the coupling between the rotor and the tower drive shaft. Having no instructions, I tightened the nut on
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-04/msg00272.html (15,351 bytes)

142. Re: [TowerTalk] Slipp-Nott (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 18:11:13 -0400
I asked the same question. A fellow from Tennadyne explained that if the wind load is high enough, the Slipp-Nott will in fact slip before the guts of the rotor are torn up. I guess that's a believab
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-04/msg00424.html (9,011 bytes)

143. [TowerTalk] How much does EHS stretch? (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 21:08:59 -0400
TowerTalkians, I need your expert advice. I climb for a friend who has a 100' Rohn 45 tower. When the big Nor'easter tore through New England recently, a large tree fell on one of his top guys. Lucki
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00044.html (11,248 bytes)

144. Re: [TowerTalk] Driving ground rods in rocky soil (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 21:26:31 -0400
There's really no point driving the rod in further if it will only be embeded in rock or roots. That's not ground and will do you no good. It would be one thing if you knew you would find ground once
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00545.html (10,834 bytes)

145. Re: [TowerTalk] Cable Conduit (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 01:10:29 -0400
There are three pictures of conduit terminations on my website, www.wc1m.com, under Cabling. The site is still under construction -- I have a lot of pictures to upload. Look at the pictures of the m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00109.html (10,561 bytes)

146. Re: [TowerTalk] buried conduit (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 12:57:16 -0400
Excellent advice on conduits, Bill. I agree with almost everything. Here are some comments: 1. Water in conduit I have read many, many posts here about drilling holes in conduit to let the water esca
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00122.html (20,635 bytes)

147. Re: [TowerTalk] elevated radials vertical (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2007 15:13:12 -0400
This is why I makes sure the screw heads on all my hose clamps face the same direction... :-) 73, Dick WC1M _______________________________________________ __________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00168.html (9,560 bytes)

148. Re: [TowerTalk] Single Point Ground (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 14:03:21 -0400
I faced a similar problem -- long path around the house to the service panel house (<50 feet). I connected a run of 1/0 copper ground wire between the single-point ground and the service panel. 73, D
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00198.html (11,929 bytes)

149. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR problem (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 18:04:33 -0400
Bill, I've been following your exploits on the SteppIR reflector, too. Jim's suggestions are excellent, and I would do all of the tests he recommends. They're easy to do. Do you have a copy of SteppI
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00209.html (16,839 bytes)

150. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR problem (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 23:22:15 -0400
I remember reading on the SteppIR reflector about the driver chips being current sources and how this makes the cable length irrelevant, except for added capacitance. I understand that added capacita
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00222.html (23,803 bytes)

151. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR problem (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:31:42 -0400
I agree that this would be a good test, but given the hassle I would opt for trying a different power supply first -- provided the resistances still check out OK and SteppIR endorses the test. If you
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00260.html (9,919 bytes)

152. [TowerTalk] SteppIR cable capacitance (was: SteppIR problem) (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:23:32 -0400
I don't want to shift the discussion too far from the original problem, so I started a related thread for everyone to chew on. I have a 4-el SteppIR at 96' at the end of a 350' cable (plus or minus 1
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00268.html (12,948 bytes)

153. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR cable length (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 01:35:29 -0400
I don't think this scenario is possible if the resistance between pairs is nominal. When the cable is disconnected from the controller, the motors are completely isolated from one another (provided t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00327.html (12,230 bytes)

154. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR problem (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 01:56:10 -0400
I sent a variation on this post to Jerry at SteppIR this afternoon: I've been thinking about the problem, too, and I've come to the conclusion that the power supply test won't reveal much -- only whe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00328.html (9,613 bytes)

155. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR problem...size wires? ala KH6 (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 08:38:20 -0400
The 16-conductor cable for the MonstIR and 4-el uses #22 gauge stranded wire. Before you do anything, you should contact SteppIR to verify that they have tested the antennas and controller with a ca
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00335.html (7,621 bytes)

156. Re: [TowerTalk] step away from steppir, Son (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:08:01 -0400
Right, and multiple SteppIRs on multiple towers would be far more expensive than multiple monobanders on multiple towers. Makes no sense. However, for a single-tower SO2R or M/S/2 contest station, a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00399.html (11,272 bytes)

157. Re: [TowerTalk] Big Grips (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:44:05 -0400
I did this recently. In both cases, read and reread the manufacturer's instructions. They do make sense after you read them several time. The most important thing I found out about installing Philly
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00438.html (10,158 bytes)

158. Re: [TowerTalk] Cheap 55G for sale (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 21:19:45 -0400
Not if you know where to buy them. Brand-new 10' straight sections of Radian Rohn 55G are listed for $236.31 each from Hill Radio Communications, a very reliable vendor. Interesting that the price i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00529.html (11,432 bytes)

159. Re: [TowerTalk] Cadwelding and grounding nightmare (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 08:32:40 -0400
Nice pics, Roger. I've never packed my one-shots, but wish I had thought to do that. I've had molten material run out of a couple of them. Then again, I've done a couple of dozen of them without pack
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00542.html (18,060 bytes)

160. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR problem-update from the front lines (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 10:20:25 -0400
I'd like to know the answers to Jerry's questions #1 and #2 below, too. Also, what make and model DVM was used to make the measurements? Was the resistance of the leads checked and subtracted from th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00550.html (19,846 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu