Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wd0m@centurytel.net: 199 ]

Total 199 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TowerTalk] Ground crew (score: 1)
Author: WD0M <wd0m@centurytel.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 14:06:15 -0700
Me too. Totally inappropriate. Take it elsewhere........ 73, Joe WD0M At 01:37 PM 2/22/2004, w7ry@centurytel.net wrote: WE DON'T NEED THAT CRAP ON THIS REFLECTOR!!! I'M OFFENDED!! Trying to keep up w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00433.html (8,443 bytes)

42. RE: [TowerTalk] Ground crew (score: 1)
Author: WD0M <wd0m@centurytel.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 15:23:23 -0700
Excuse me, but since when is it OK to post R-rated stuff (even a link) on this reflector? I'll pass on the personal insults. 73, Joe WD0M At 02:18 PM 2/22/2004, Joe Subich, K4IK wrote: He said it was
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00438.html (8,195 bytes)

43. Re: [TowerTalk] re: Ground Crew (score: 1)
Author: WD0M <wd0m@centurytel.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 17:41:35 -0700
"Handled it very well"..........hmmm..........why should it have had to be handled on Tower talk reflector in the first place? Simply inappropriate. At 05:35 PM 2/22/2004, you wrote: -- Original Mess
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00445.html (8,434 bytes)

44. [TowerTalk] Interesting Policy (score: 1)
Author: WD0M <wd0m@centurytel.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 17:45:36 -0700
Isn't it interesting that AOL defends someone against receiving "...complaints from AOL's member base" when that individual sees nothing wrong with posting R-rated links on Tower talk? 73, Joe WD0< D
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00447.html (9,327 bytes)

45. Re: [TowerTalk] Look at his response (score: 1)
Author: WD0M <wd0m@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 08:49:10 -0700
It does - thanks for the pity, but I don't need it. Save it for those young hams who click on the link and, as their parents walk into the room, suffer the consequences. This reflector isn't just for
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00483.html (8,528 bytes)

46. Re: [TowerTalk] Look at his response (score: 1)
Author: WD0M <wd0m@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 09:14:34 -0700
Perhaps because someone, unthinkingly, provided it in the first place? Here's a novel suggestion - let's let the moderator determine if links to "R-rated" sites are permissible on his reflector. Stev
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00486.html (8,586 bytes)

47. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Selection (score: 1)
Author: Joe <WD0M@centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:06:43 -0700
I sure love my SteppIR 4 element. Virtually a 1:1 SWR from 20 - 6 meters. SteppIR is supposedly coming out with a 30/40 capable yagi this year. You could always go for a single bander 40 M version in
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00317.html (7,724 bytes)

48. Re: [TowerTalk] Kevlar,phillystran cable (score: 1)
Author: Joe <WD0M@centurytel.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 08:43:43 -0700
Here are two sources for Phillystran: http://www.texastowers.com/philly.htm http://www.burghardt-amateur.com/Burghardt/Phillystran/phillystran.html 73, Joe WD0M At 03:05 AM 3/19/2004, Paul Jensen wro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00330.html (7,985 bytes)

49. Re: [TowerTalk] static cat (score: 1)
Author: Joe <WD0M@centurytel.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 06:58:46 -0700
I've talked to a few folks here in Colorado who use metal chimney sweep brushes to do the same thing on their towers. Attached to the top of the mast, the brush supposedly dissipates charges. I'm tol
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00376.html (8,583 bytes)

50. Re: [TowerTalk] HF beam antenna decision (score: 1)
Author: Joe <WD0M@centurytel.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 09:23:40 -0600
On top of my US Tower TX-455 is a SteppIR 4 element - beyond the size limitations you are facing, so may I suggest a 3 element SteppIR, which covers 6 meters through 20 meters, all WARC bands, and pr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00273.html (9,874 bytes)

51. Re: [TowerTalk] FCC's NPRM on BPL (score: 1)
Author: Joe <WD0M@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 19:37:23 -0600
Thanks for the reminder - done. The link below makes it easy to find. 73, Joe WD0M At 05:56 PM 4/26/2004, k2qmf@juno.com wrote: Hello All, Everyone should make a comment regarding the NPRM from the F
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00483.html (7,667 bytes)

52. Re: [TowerTalk] PL-259 vs N (score: 1)
Author: Joe <WD0M@centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 18:56:55 -0600
Geez...........and just after I sold all my UHF gear! ;-) I'll remember this one for the future - thanks! 73, Joe WD0M At 06:52 PM 4/29/2004, Dino Darling wrote: There is an N-Connector made by Andro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00667.html (9,222 bytes)

53. Re: [TowerTalk] Yaesu rotors (score: 1)
Author: Joe <WD0M@centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 08:12:53 -0600
I've been using a Yaesu G-1000SDX for many years - bought it when I was in Alaska. While there, the temperatures hit - 40 F, we recorded 125 mph wind gusts, and had 20 feet of snow over a winter. I l
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00074.html (8,420 bytes)

54. Re: [TowerTalk] Heath Cantenna (score: 1)
Author: Joe <WD0M@centurytel.net>
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 13:16:07 -0600
Seems that the EPA has decided PCBs are a danger, albeit if safely handled, the risk is minimized: "How can I tell whether a piece of equipment contains PCBs? "Check for a manufacturer's label, which
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00091.html (10,764 bytes)

55. RE: [TowerTalk] Re: [FCG] HF LOG-PERIODIC ANTENNAS Comments Please (score: 1)
Author: Joe <WD0M@centurytel.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:40:01 -0600
Sounds like Force 12 propaganda...check their web site. ;-) Then check the SteppIR web site. Interesting comparisons. My momma always told me not to step on someone to make myself look taller. My Ste
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00470.html (11,852 bytes)

56. Re: [TowerTalk] HF LOG-PERIODIC ANTENNAS Comments Please (score: 1)
Author: Joe <WD0M@centurytel.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 20:02:57 -0600
The first SteppIR has been up for 3 plus years, and has experienced no problems. I had to take my Mosley Pro57B down several times in that period to make adjustments within that same time frame. My S
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00481.html (11,326 bytes)

57. [TowerTalk] Re: BPL Comments (score: 1)
Author: Joe <WD0M@centurytel.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 10:39:56 -0600
This young man gives me great hope for the future. 73, Joe WD&Oslash;M Reply Comments by to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking by Benjamin S. Gelb, KF4KJQ, a graduating senior at Thomas Jefferson High
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00031.html (7,813 bytes)

58. Re: [TowerTalk] Archeological find in my Anchor hole (score: 1)
Author: Joe <WD0M@centurytel.net>
Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 09:38:24 -0600
Wow! Quite the story - you did the right thing! I guess I should be happy that I had to anchor my tower base to bedrock, which was only 6 inches below surface, rather than risk encountering an archae
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00101.html (10,351 bytes)

59. Re: [TowerTalk] Entry Panel in Wall or External to Building? (score: 1)
Author: Joe <WD0M@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 09:07:05 -0600
Interesting question, Doc. I was going to pose exactly that this morning, but you beat me to it. I have a single point ground panel (thick copper plate) populated with various ICE arrestors, and was
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00143.html (10,003 bytes)

60. Re: [TowerTalk] Stuck tower is unstuck! (score: 1)
Author: Joe <WD0M@centurytel.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 08:28:58 -0600
Thanks for sharing, David - my UST TX-455 is a couple of feet under the 55' maximum for that reason. When I first put it up, I cranked it to the top - and it didn't "feel right". I lowered it a coupl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00247.html (9,951 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu