Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wtrone@comcast.net: 66 ]

Total 66 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 40M Steppir? (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 22:00:03 -0600
A while ago, someone posted that they thought that Steppir was working on a new model which would include 40M. I sent them an email requesting information on future products, but have heard nothing.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00261.html (6,933 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] BN-86 (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:53:17 -0600
I am going to replace the BN-86 on my TH7 this Spring. I am wondering if anyone has bought a BN-86 since MFJ took over the Hy-Gain operation? If so, what do you think of the quality of the balun? Any
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00315.html (6,651 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Steppir 3 or 4 EL? (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 08:39:58 -0600
I have downloaded and have been reading the information on the 3 and 4 element Steppir beams. One thing that I have noticed is that the 4 element beam has about 1.7-1.8 dB more gain than the 3 elemen
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00420.html (7,482 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] Beam Height (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 08:45:02 -0600
As a follow on to the Steppir discussion, I was wondering (since 20 and 17 M will probably be the "hot" bands as we enter the low part of the sun cycle) if there is an "optimal" tower height (for jus
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00421.html (7,025 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] TH11DX and Belden 9913 (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 19:49:21 -0600
I was looking at the instruction manual for the HyGain TH11DX and noticed that it said that Belden 9913 coax is NOT recommended as feedline. Anyone know why? I just bought some CQ FLEXI 4XL from the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00555.html (6,737 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] TH11DX and Belden 9913 (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 22:12:45 -0600
Thanks for all the excellent comments on Belden 9913. I guess that I made the "right" decision in getting the CQ FLEXI 4XL. As one final question, has anyone on this thread used it directly to a beam
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00558.html (10,160 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] 40M Steppir? (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 18:03:07 -0600
Thanks! I talked to them earlier this week when I ordered a 3 element Steppir. They confirmed that they were working on a 40 M version or two, but were unsure when it would be ready for the market. I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00071.html (8,881 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] 40M Steppir? Long answer coming (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 21:16:45 -0600
Wonder if someone could describe what a Moxon element is? I don't recall ever seeing this term used before. Thanks. 73 Bernard, WA4OEJ back. for 9.5 could Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00086.html (9,865 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] 40M Steppir? Long answer coming (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 21:54:27 -0600
Thanks! That is a GREAT link. It does a good job of explaining the theory and concept. If the Steppir can/will evolve into some of those designs, I think that we will have a most interesting alternat
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00088.html (12,670 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Heights "Clanging" noise at moderate winds (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:11:32 -0600
I have an old (bought new in 1975) Heights 72 ft (18 sq ft rating) on a 4 ft tilt base and don't have the "clanging" sound that you are talking about. Wonder about the "fit" from section to section.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00320.html (10,089 bytes)

11. [TowerTalk] Steppir VS UV Light (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 17:31:02 -0600
Does anyone know if the fiberglass rods that Steppir uses for their antenna elements are specially treated to resist UV sunlight? I looked at their website but could not find the answer. Maybe it was
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00456.html (7,420 bytes)

12. [TowerTalk] Steppir and UV Continued (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 18:30:24 -0600
I called Fluidmotion this morning and talked to Jim about a few "technical" issues that I will pass on to the board. 1. He said that the fiberglass elements were treated for UV protection. When I ask
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00642.html (8,596 bytes)

13. [TowerTalk] Fw: Steppir and UV (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 16:47:01 -0600
Con: I suspect that others would also be interested in what UV protective paint/ epoxy to use and where to buy it. However, I have not received any comment on the question. How about it, anyone have
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00013.html (8,049 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR 4 Element Yagi - Analysis and Thoughts (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 22:14:40 -0500
I haven't received my QST just yet. Is there any mention of any other version of the antenna? I have a 3 element SteppIR on order. It sure would be nice to have the driven element cover 40-10M and th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00211.html (12,400 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR 4 Element Yagi - Analysis and Thoughts (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 07:13:01 -0500
Joe: I was wondering if you or anyone else on this thread have considered a single antenna (like a SteppIR) on a motorized tower where you could raise and lower the tower to optimize to the angle of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00219.html (11,038 bytes)

16. Re: Varying Antenna Height was: Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR 4 ElementYagi - Analysis and Thoughts (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 18:24:35 -0500
Thanks to all who replied on this thread. There were a lot of good comments and I am going to print the answers for future reference. I did get my copy of QST today and that MonstIR antenna is some a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00231.html (13,106 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] HF beam antenna decision (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 17:06:40 -0500
Bill: I went through the same sort of scenario several months ago. I reviewed the specifications and data from all the major manufacturers of 20-10 M beams. Overall flexibility and performance were m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00291.html (10,640 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] HF beam antenna decision (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 07:35:23 -0500
I believe that they use a 2:1 balun inside the motor control housing of the driven element. It is on their website somewhere. There are also some pictures of it. 73 Bernard, WA4OEJ presents ohms a ga
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00315.html (11,738 bytes)

19. [TowerTalk] Forec 12 Sigma 80 (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 21:12:06 -0500
Anyone on this board using or have used a Force 12 Sigma 80 vertical dipole? If so, what can you tell me about it? 73 Bernard, WA4OEJ _______________________________________________ See: http://www.m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00377.html (6,607 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] F-12 Sigma 80 (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 17:25:30 -0500
If you get a copy, I would like one too. I asked users for comments on this vertical a couple of weeks ago. I only received two posts. One was pro and one was con. If anyone else has or has used one,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00045.html (7,882 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu