Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wtrone@comcast.net: 66 ]

Total 66 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR Redux (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 18:19:04 -0500
Just as a point of reference, I ordered a 3 element SteppIR on March 1, 2004. I called, again, last week and was told that it would be about another 2 weeks. For what it is worth. 73, Bernard, WA4OEJ
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00120.html (11,358 bytes)

22. Re: [TowerTalk] RE: TowerTalk Digest, Vol 17, Issue 30 (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 07:07:21 -0500
Have you tried twisting and turning the tower, from the top section, as it is on the ground? I would hope that you could make it clang while at ground level. As I mentioned some time ago, mine makes
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00238.html (11,300 bytes)

23. [TowerTalk] 3 EL SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 07:10:26 -0500
I received a UPS shipping notice last night from Fluid Motion that my 3EL SteppIR had finally been shipped. Its been 2 1/2 months since I ordered it. So, if any of you are considering a new SteppIR f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00239.html (6,777 bytes)

24. Re: [TowerTalk] T500 (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 17:05:52 -0500
Rusty: Good luck on your 4 element SteppIR. I ordered a 3 element on March 1st and was told that it would take about 6 weeks. It didn't arrive until May 18th. I guess they are selling everything that
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00517.html (9,922 bytes)

25. Re: [TowerTalk] Using older rotor cable? (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 11:29:39 -0500
In my opinion, cable that old should be replaced. The fact that you are questioning replacement indicates that you have some doubt in its overall service capability. If it is difficult to service you
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00601.html (9,053 bytes)

26. Re: [TowerTalk] Broken Self Supporting Crank Up Tower (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 22:01:56 -0500
If you have ever had a tower come crashing down, you would know that it is much better to do the "right" thing up front than have a big mess sitting in your back yard. 73 Bernard, WA4OEJ beam only ge
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00252.html (11,494 bytes)

27. Re: [TowerTalk] HF LOG-PERIODIC ANTENNAS Comments Please (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 07:50:23 -0500
Jeff: Some things are just not worth taking note of. I am looking forward to putting up my new 3 element SteppIR, but, first, a couple of pine trees must disappear. That should happen within the next
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00586.html (12,909 bytes)

28. Re: [TowerTalk] non-hams on Towertalk (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 16:54:38 -0500
I am certainly NOT embarrassed by my 2X3 call that I have had since April 1963. I've been an extra class for quite a while so I have had opportunities to change. I'm just not going to do it. LOL!!! J
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00583.html (9,728 bytes)

29. [TowerTalk] Perplexing Antenna Problem (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 14:40:19 -0500
I posted the following message on the Yahoo SteppIR board and thought that I might also get some ideas on this board. I have an interesting problem for all of you antenna experts out there. If you ha
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00623.html (8,499 bytes)

30. Re: [TowerTalk] Perplexing Antenna Problem (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 17:03:38 -0500
I have also measured the SWRs with a completely different set of coax to eliminate coax and/ or connector problems. No difference. 73, Bernard, WA4OEJ the cable is bad (does not show up until you hav
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00627.html (11,544 bytes)

31. Re: [TowerTalk] Perplexing Antenna Problem (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 20:38:20 -0500
John: The tower is folded over. The antenna is almost vertical and the measurements are made in the 180 degree mode. If I tune in on a strong signal, say on 20M, and then do a calibrate, you can see
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00631.html (12,566 bytes)

32. Re: [TowerTalk] Perplexing Antenna Problem (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 20:39:35 -0500
Bob: Yep, all confirmed one step at a time. 73, Bernard, WA4OEJ time. coax end start. that able of (also from about talk any _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00632.html (15,872 bytes)

33. Re: [TowerTalk] Perplexing Antenna Problem (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 20:42:05 -0500
I don't think so. In previous tests, when I had the Ameritron antenna switch in line, I would switch to the GAP Challenger and measure the SWR on the same frequency. SWR was from 1.2 to 2.5 depending
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00633.html (12,871 bytes)

34. Re: [SteppIR] [TowerTalk] New antenna system (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 19:33:08 -0600
Howard: Just curious, how far apart do you have your two antennas? I have a 3 element and have considered (just thinking) stacking two. 73, It seems strange that the harshest, possibly the only criti
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00225.html (10,552 bytes)

35. Re: [TowerTalk] New antenna system (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 18:00:11 -0600
What's to say that Fluid Motion can't take a few of these suggestions, like more memory in the controller and "protected" outputs and upgrade their product? I know that they monitor these boards from
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00284.html (16,658 bytes)

36. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12? (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 09:41:43 -0600
Well, I might as well throw in my 2 cents. I was very interested (last Summer) in the Force 12 Sigma series of verticals for 80/ 40 M using the new Tornado tuning drive. My first email was answered p
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00221.html (11,297 bytes)

37. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12? (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 10:39:31 -0600
Hey John, interesting to hear your comments! Agreed!!!! Force 12 really needs to take some swift action to solve this problem or problems that they are having. Just this week I talked to Molly at Cro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00224.html (11,217 bytes)

38. Re: [TowerTalk] Returning disputed items,was: BANISHMENT FROM TOWER TALK (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 09:07:36 -0600
I would like to know who this ebay seller is because I have been bidding on some Collins equipment and your description sounds familiar. You can reply directly to me if you would rather not post the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00249.html (11,417 bytes)

39. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12? (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 15:19:35 -0600
Tom: Why not consider the SteppIR? IMO, their customer service is second to none. 73, Bernard, WA4OEJ -- Original Message -- From: "WA2BPE" <wa2bpe@infoblvd.net> To: "Pete Smith" <n4zr@contesting.com
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00260.html (12,263 bytes)

40. [TowerTalk] T2X Starting Capacitor (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 16:42:55 -0600
Do any of you have a good source or two for the 130-156MFD, 125 VAC starting capacitor used on the T2X rotor? TIA. 73, Bernard, WA4OEJ _______________________________________________ See: http://www.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00729.html (6,916 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu