- 1. RE: [BULK] - Re: RE: [BULK] - [TowerTalk] CC&Rs (score: 1)
- Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:10:39 -0800
- Maybe someone has tried that and succeeded, but I haven't heard or read about it. However, locally several individuals pressed the OTARD rule as hard as they could and the general results were worded
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00561.html (8,218 bytes)
- 2. RE: [BULK] - Re: RE: [BULK] - [TowerTalk] CC&Rs (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 12:22:54 -0800
- At 11:10 AM 3/25/2004 -0800, Steve Katz wrote: Maybe someone has tried that and succeeded, but I haven't heard or read about it. However, locally several individuals pressed the OTARD rule as hard as
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00563.html (10,798 bytes)
- 3. RE: [BULK] - Re: RE: [BULK] - [TowerTalk] CC&Rs (score: 1)
- Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 12:31:33 -0800
- Jim, that is exactly the kind of case I was looking for! Can you provide details on this? Thanks, Steve WB2WIK/6 "Success is the ability to go from failure to failure with no loss of enthusiasm." -Wi
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00565.html (8,268 bytes)
- 4. Re: [BULK] - Re: RE: [BULK] - [TowerTalk] CC&Rs (score: 1)
- Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 17:46:32 -0800
- When I was K6ACZ in a CC&R area I used a 36 inch MFJ tunable loop ant disguised as a TV yagi. From the ground it looked like any other TV antenna. Worked better than a low dipole or a R-7 on a 10 ft
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00571.html (10,769 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu