Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+\[TowerTalk\]\s+Optimum\s+Height\s+for\s+10M\s+Beam\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+\[TowerTalk\]\s+Optimum\s+Height\s+for\s+10M\s+Beam\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Re: [TowerTalk] Optimum Height for 10M Beam (score: 1): Author: sbookout@mnsinc.com (Steve Bookout); Date: Sat, 13 Dec 1997 20:22:30 -0500; Hello all. A few years ago when I put up my rotating tower here at the new QTH, I put my trusty 205 Hygain at about 85 feet. This seemed like a good place because it was right above my second guy rin; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00331.html (11,834 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Re: [TowerTalk] Optimum Height for 10M Beam (score: 1): Author: harpole@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu (Charles H. Harpole); Date: Sun, 14 Dec 1997 23:22:06 -0500 (EST); I still say that if you must be limited to one beam and one height, a TH-7 at 70 feet is the best that can be had. K4VUD -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towert; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00347.html (7,943 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Re: [TowerTalk] Optimum Height for 10M Beam (score: 1): Author: dick@libelle.com (Dick Flanagan); Date: Sun, 14 Dec 1997 20:39:10 -0800; I might change that to a TH-11, but I certainly agree with your premise. 73, Dick -- Dick Flanagan W6OLD CFII Minden, Nevada DM09db (South of Reno) Visit http://www.qsl.net/w7di/ -- FAQ on WWW: http:; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00348.html (8,203 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]