Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\"no\s+subject\"\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\"no\s+subject\"\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] "no subject" (score: 1): Author: "Gene Fuller" <w2lu@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 00:09:34 -0400; For any who might be a slow whited as I, don't even think about opening any of the "no subject" postings that have been showing up. Too bad they can't be filtered out. I opened one a couple of weeks; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00421.html (7,180 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] "no subject" (score: 1): Author: Mike <nf4l@att.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 05:04:05 -0400; Gene, It's been a long time since I used Outlook Express, but I'd be surprised if you couldn't set a filter based on Subject contains no subject. 73, Mike NF4L _______________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00424.html (7,830 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] "no subject" (score: 1): Author: Frank <frankkamp@att.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 12:36:46 -0600; I Believe most mail prorams allow filtering on subject line info. At least mine does. I never even see mail that has no subject. Such nonsense gets trashed immediately. Also, today you can buy 500gig; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00428.html (8,127 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] "no subject" (score: 1): Author: RMorris <robrk@nidhog.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:06:04 -0400; Use free Thunderbird, make filters. Better yet, dump Microsoft and put Linux on your box. Don't say you don't know how to use it. It's like getting out of a Chevy and getting into a Ford. Might take; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00429.html (9,053 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]