Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+$Long$\s+\-\-\s+ATR\-30\s+and\s+AT4K\s+Antenna\s+Tuners\]\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+$Long$\s+\-\-\s+ATR\-30\s+and\s+AT4K\s+Antenna\s+Tuners\]\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] (Long) -- ATR-30 and AT4K Antenna Tuners] (score: 1): Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson); Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 15:30:44 -0700; Jim, Don't bother reposting. I already have forwarded this reformatted text. Tabs are a bit iffy for email readers. 73, Eric N7CL -- Start of forwarded message -- From: "Jim Reid" <jreid@aloha.net> T; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00260.html (14,661 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] (Long) -- ATR-30 and AT4K Antenna Tuners] (score: 1): Author: w8ji@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 23:07:26 +0000; Hi Jim, It looks like there is little difference in these tuners, based on your post. That assumes there is nothing wrong with the components in the 4K, and the ATR 30 is built to spec. I'm more comf; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00266.html (14,727 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]