Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\(Repost\)\s+Engineering\s+advice\s+on\s+above\s+ground\s+foundation\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] (Repost) Engineering advice on above ground foundation (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <StevesLists1@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 03:23:55 -0400
Poor soil can be assumed. If it still looks adequate..... Agreed, but it's already done. Analysis at this point is not "failure analysis" Steve K8LX _______________________________________________ __
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00175.html (8,761 bytes)

22. Re: [TowerTalk] (Repost) Engineering advice on above ground foundation (score: 1)
Author: "John Lemay" <john@carltonhouse.eclipse.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 10:42:19 +0100
Hi Rudy Looks like you've had plenty of "advice" from this group. You are spot-on in your opening sentence, when you say that it's a "rather complex situation". You have already cast the base, so you
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00176.html (13,621 bytes)

23. Re: [TowerTalk] (Repost) Engineering advice on above ground foundation (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 13:15:02 -0400
I agree with the need for more details and at this point an engineer, or at least someone from the local zoning board although the second might create more problems at this point. Some where around h
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00183.html (13,115 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu