Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\[Bulk\]\s+Radial\s+question\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Radial question (score: 1)
Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 12:27:44 -0800
In addition to Rudy Severn's work (antennasbyn6lf.com) take a look at what Al Christman modeled http://ncjweb.com/bonus-content/k3lcmaxgainradials.pdf then make a decision that is dollar or backache
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00325.html (10,087 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Radial question (score: 1)
Author: Drax Felton <draxfelton@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 18:46:31 -0500
I always liked this article where they optimize the length of wire you have vs. radial count vs. radial length. http://ncjweb.com/bonus-content/k3lcmaxgainradials.pdf The radials on my 160 meter vert
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00326.html (10,143 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Radial question (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 18:37:15 -0600
For ground-laid radials, didn't Jim make the point that they serve primarily to shield the Earth from the antenna's RF? 73, kelly, ve4xt Sent from my iPhone __________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00331.html (11,070 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Radial question (score: 1)
Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 06:38:50 -0800
A lot of folks are "defeated" by the 160m SSB contest, the most work per Q of any big contest, IMO. More wire, even elevated you 2', will help shield the earth and reduce loss, 65' is too short for 1
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00035.html (9,639 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Radial question (score: 1)
Author: "John Santillo N2HMM" <n2hmm@warwick.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 15:14:25 -0500 (EST)
I agree, the QSO rate is slower than most contests and can be frustrating without the right antenna(s). The noise level can do you in too. My main antenna is an Inverted L with the vertical portion u
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00041.html (12,083 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Radial question (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 20:33:05 -0800
Completely defeated in 160 phone contest and felt like running through 30dB ATT on 160 (estimated radiation efficiency of 5%). NN5T Jon No mention whatsoever of transmitter power. I will assume its
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00050.html (9,201 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu