Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\[Bulk\]\s+Re\:\s+Mast\s+Material\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: Mast Material (score: 1)
Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 11:21:40 -0700
"Regular" sch40 pipe is often specified as 30kpsi yield strength, but schxx IPS is available to 70kpsi. The example fence folks are specifying 50kpsi and a non-standard wall thickness of 0.120" which
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00251.html (13,717 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: Mast Material (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:37:27 -0400
The fence rail can bend a long way and spring back, without damage. I discovered this the hard way along with never assume the people you "thought" were experienced really are. Always monitor what's
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00252.html (16,179 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: Mast Material (score: 1)
Author: JVarney <jvarn359@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 10:42:41 -0700
I would feel safe with SS40 fence post as a gin pole because it is a structural tube. What defines structural tubing is not the intended purpose, it's the specifications and certifications. SS40 meet
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00253.html (7,686 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: Mast Material (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:41:06 -0400
I had no qualms about using the fence rail as a gin pole. It was after all, stronge than many commercial poles using a rather thin wall Aluminum Tube and much more resistant to off axis loads. The ke
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00255.html (16,318 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu