Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\[Bulk\]\s+Re\:\s+Top\s+Bearing\s+Plate\s+for\s+55G\s+vs\s+Rotor\s+Plate\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: Top Bearing Plate for 55G vs Rotor Plate (score: 1)
Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 09:52:21 -0700
I agree with Steve that a middle bearing is not a good idea as aligning 3 bearings is very difficult and a middle bearing serves no purpose at rotator rpms. However, a middle support plate with a rem
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-08/msg00247.html (11,160 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: Top Bearing Plate for 55G vs Rotor Plate (score: 1)
Author: Gary Jones <garyejones@cmaaccess.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 11:58:55 -0500
Here is my take. For the amount of money that you are going to put into your Rohn 55 install, the amount of money to do the top section right (that is by engineering spec) is a drop in the bucket to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-08/msg00248.html (12,671 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: Top Bearing Plate for 55G vs Rotor Plate (score: 1)
Author: "Don " <w7wll@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 10:15:08 -0700
THAT is a good idea, the UHMW bored block. Zerk fittings and the plain old typical steel inlanders use go quickly here. Living on the OR coast next to the ocean you learn quickly that putting antenna
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-08/msg00250.html (12,992 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: Top Bearing Plate for 55G vs Rotor Plate (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 11:59:54 -0600
Here is my take. A blanket statement does not fit all situations. A middle bearing does have merit. I cases where a long mast fits inside the tower or there are stacked antennas on the same mast, a m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-08/msg00272.html (12,301 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: Top Bearing Plate for 55G vs Rotor Plate (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Aycock" <billaycock@mediacombb.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 18:28:02 -0500
Bad lack of understanding or poor wording -- Bending moment is the result of applied force and geometry-- NOT material. Bill--W4BSG --Original Message-- From: Doug Renwick Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-08/msg00286.html (14,430 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu