Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\[RFI\]\s+Subwoofer\s+resolution\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\[RFI\]\s+Subwoofer\s+resolution\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] [RFI] Subwoofer resolution (score: 1): Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 13:13:41 -0400; "It turns out that the dominant cause of the susceptibility was a pin 1 problem!" It's not only microphones. Our lab's data acquisition cards and breakout boxes have a pin 1 problem as well. Very pop; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00537.html (7,068 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] [RFI] Subwoofer resolution (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 11:53:53 -0700; Yes. It's also in virtually every computer audio interface (the mic and line ins and outs), almost all home audio gear, and nearly all ham gear. My FT1000MP has RF feedback on 15M and 75M that is cau; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00541.html (7,845 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] [RFI] Subwoofer resolution (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 16:50:54 -0700; Well.. the metal boxes DO protect things from dings and mechanical damage... And this kind of thing is why I'd love to have more optical interconnects (e.g. TOSlink style) or Ethernet (which is trans; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00553.html (9,301 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] [RFI] Subwoofer resolution (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 17:07:20 -0700; can You don't need DC isolation to prevent pin 1 problems. All you need to do is connect the cable shield to the shielding enclosure. What could be simpler (and cheaper)? This whole myth about the ne; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00555.html (8,753 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] [RFI] Subwoofer resolution (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 18:44:42 -0700; IF you actually have a cable shield, and IF there's actually a useful shielding enclosure. I would agree. Even more so.. I was thinking more for those situations where you have long cable runs, and t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00558.html (9,730 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] [RFI] Subwoofer resolution (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 23:46:16 -0700; Of course. And that's a great example of an interface that should be balanced! The high futility industry did us all a great disservice when they standardized on unbalanced interfaces to connect thei; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00561.html (7,910 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] [RFI] Subwoofer resolution (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 06:18:03 -0700; Much cheaper to throw on a few microinches of gold or print directional arrows on the speaker zip cord than it is to actually add components or change the connector style. After all, if it was good e; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00597.html (9,432 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]