Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\[Tower\s+Talk\]\s+Solutions\s+for\s+Tower\s+Base\s+in\s+Fresh\s+Water\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] [Tower Talk] Solutions for Tower Base in Fresh Water? (score: 1)
Author: Larry Libsch <llibsch@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:49:36 -0400
Group - The tower is self standing, adding to the difficulties. Thanks for much good advice from many respondents. Sounds like we need to do some serious rethinking. Larry, K4KGG ____________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00321.html (6,923 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] [Tower Talk] Solutions for Tower Base in Fresh Water? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 07:57:59 -0700
Freestanding, unguyed.. Then you're all set. Assuming you talk to an Engineer with some local experience, it's mostly a matter of building a suitable base that can take the overturning moment. Since
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00324.html (8,703 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] [Tower Talk] Solutions for Tower Base in Fresh Water? (score: 1)
Author: n8de@thepoint.net
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 11:11:11 -0400
Unguyed? Rohn? Doesn't that contradict the basic rule: Do what the manufacturer says??? Rohn tower, if I remember correctly is designed to be GUYED ... not free-standing. 73 Don N8DE ________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00325.html (9,675 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] [Tower Talk] Solutions for Tower Base in Fresh Water? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 08:31:38 -0700
Maybe it's short enough to be free standing? The OP didn't give a height. The Engineer will tell them whether it's doable. Maybe there's other solutions too.. Building antennas in a swamp/flooded are
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00326.html (8,564 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] [Tower Talk] Solutions for Tower Base in Fresh Water? (score: 1)
Author: Larry Libsch <llibsch@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 12:10:48 -0400
Don - Yes, the tower is Rohn and yes, it was designed to be unguyed. It's Rohn HD3-5-54G. It's retractable, tilts at the bottom and folds at about 8 feet. The documents say it's experimental, which m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00328.html (8,218 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] [Tower Talk] Solutions for Tower Base in Fresh Water? (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 10:24:48 -0500
He didn't say it was a guyed Rohn. Could be BX or even SSV. 73,kelly ve4xt _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list Tower
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00330.html (10,711 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] [Tower Talk] Solutions for Tower Base in Fresh Water? (score: 1)
Author: K8RI <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:55:25 -0400
He said "tilt base" so I'd doubt the tower is free standing or very short. 73 Roger (K8RI) _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk ma
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00332.html (8,207 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] [Tower Talk] Solutions for Tower Base in Fresh Water? (score: 1)
Author: "Gary \"Joe\" Mayfield" <gary_mayfield@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 20:47:54 -0500
My free standing tower has a tilt base. Rohn HDBX-48 rated for 18 sq ft of antenna. It is 48 feet high. 73, Joe kk0sd --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-bou
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00334.html (9,313 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu