Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\[Tower\s+Talk\]\s+Was\s+something\s+else\s+\-\s+Now\s+Radian\s+specsvs\.\s+Peoria\s+specs\s+\?\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] [Tower Talk] Was something else - Now Radian specsvs. Peoria specs ?? (score: 1)
Author: GALE STEWARD <k3nd@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 12:46:59 -0700 (PDT)
Don't know about the base dimensions but the anchor dimensions look all wrong! 2 ft X 2 ft X 1 foot deep??? I'd be more worried about the anchors than the base. BTW, my 60 ft R25 base is 2 X 2 X 3.5
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00754.html (8,565 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] [Tower Talk] Was something else - Now Radian specsvs. Peoria specs ?? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:18:29 -0700
Purely speculation, but a lot has changed in the last 25 years, including how windspeeds are specified (or, more properly, what load corresponds to what rated speed), perhaps some assumptions about t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00757.html (10,419 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] [Tower Talk] Was something else - Now Radian specsvs. Peoria specs ?? (score: 1)
Author: "Dick, W1KSZ" <w1ksz@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:51:23 -0400
I think they changed the windload from 75 mph to 90 mph. 73, Dick, W1KSZ -- 73, Dick, W1KSZ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00758.html (11,090 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu