Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+10\s+\-\s+40\s+Beam\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+10\s+\-\s+40\s+Beam\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 10 - 40 Beam (score: 1): Author: "Barry Fox" <foxbw@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 08:48:37 -0500; Wayne, I am also in the research phase of acquiring a new antenna and 10 - 40 meters on one boom was one of my requirements. Force 12 makes 3 different beams that fit. Wind Turn Model Boom Wgt Load R; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00165.html (7,298 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] 10 - 40 Beam (score: 1): Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>; Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 23:51:24 -0400; It seems to me that a 2 inch boom is really too short... Rex K1HI Rex Lint, Consultant PH: 603-860-7651 FAX: 603-882-6612 --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00182.html (8,813 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] 10 - 40 Beam (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2006 21:36:32 -0700; Hi Rex Well, it all depends on the thickness of the elements. 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list Tower; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00183.html (7,025 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] 10 - 40 Beam (score: 1): Author: "K8RI on Tower talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>; Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 01:54:28 -0400; I wouldn't expect element thickness to play more than a small part unless the elements are very close together and then I'd not expect much gain. How long is the boom? Roger Halstead (K8RI and ARRL; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00184.html (8,300 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] 10 - 40 Beam (score: 1): Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>; Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 10:02:24 -0400; With a 2 inch long boom, they'd be pretty close together... I wouldn't expect element thickness to play more than a small part unless the elements are very close together and then I'd not expect much; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00187.html (8,995 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] 10 - 40 Beam (score: 1): Author: "David Cook" <davepc2@netdave.com>; Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 12:29:47 -0700; Ok, I'll bite. How wide is the boom? :-) _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.c; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00189.html (10,586 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] 10 - 40 Beam (score: 1): Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2006 22:55:55 -0500; Depends on the size and shape of the aircraft and how fast it was traveling ... -- Thanks! & 73, doc kd4e bibleseven.com _______________________________________________ ______________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00190.html (7,938 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] 10 - 40 Beam (score: 1): Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 21:01:14 -0600; 9 elements on a 2 inch boom. I wonder what the claimed gain is. Has K7LXC and N0AX tested this engineering marvel yet? Ok, I'll bite. How wide is the boom? :-) _______________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00191.html (11,652 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] 10 - 40 Beam (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 20:02:46 -0700; 32 feet -:):) Mike, W4EF................................ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.co; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00192.html (11,832 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]