Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+160\s+M\s+Inverted\s+L\s+Questions\.\.\.\.\?\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+160\s+M\s+Inverted\s+L\s+Questions\.\.\.\.\?\?\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 160 M Inverted L Questions....??? (score: 1): Author: "R. David Eagle" <kb8nnu@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 08:41:15 -0700 (PDT); Howdy all... I am interested in putting up an Inverted L for 160 and not sure which version would be best. I see in the antenna handbook they have one with the radials that uses a simple impedance ma; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00843.html (7,558 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] 160 M Inverted L Questions....??? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 10:24:41 -0700; In general, the vertical portion of the antenna provides the vertically polarized component of radiation, and is more lower angle radiation. The horizontal portion radiates horizontally polarized, an; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00846.html (8,528 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] 160 M Inverted L Questions....??? (score: 1): Author: "Dick Green" <dickgreen@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 18:11:03 -0400; Hmm... 1/8 wave above the ground for elevated radials... now, at 160m that would be about... 60 feet! Compared with actually trying to achieve that miracle, I guess it would be worth the trouble to l; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00869.html (9,854 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] 160 M Inverted L Questions....??? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:47:41 -0700; EXACTLY! 73, Jim _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/li; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00885.html (7,692 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]