Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+160\s+ant\s+problem\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+160\s+ant\s+problem\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 160 ant problem (score: 1): Author: zeitler@ibm.net (zeitler@ibm.net); Date: Mon, 21 Sep 1998 20:05:22 -0700; Gentlemen, I have a problem and seek advice. My city lot is quite small. Around 65 feet wide by around 100 long. I would like to get back on 160 meters. I have no tower and need to go rather incognit; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00557.html (7,658 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] 160 ant problem (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 08:32:50 -0400; Hi Lane, The around A "T" antenna is a good choice, if you install a good ground. The ground should use as many radials as possible kept in the straightest line possible, and you should tie in anythi; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00562.html (8,294 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] 160 ant problem (score: 1): Author: w7why@mail.coos.or.us (Tom Osborne); Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 19:38:57 -0700; Hi Lane. That would be a good antenna. If you had to, you could hang some drop wires off the ends of the horizontal section to make it a litle longer. 73 Tom W7WHY -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contestin; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00574.html (7,378 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] 160 ant problem (score: 1): Author: n8ug@juno.com (n8ug@juno.com); Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 17:06:13 -0400; Lane, the best I've seen for a predicament like yours is a shortened 160 dipole put out by SPIRO. 100 ft long with 2 "shorteners" (coils), center fed. $54.95 made up. They also have a 70 footer that; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00789.html (9,444 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]