Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+160M\s+Antennas\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+160M\s+Antennas\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 160M antennas (score: 1): Author: "Mel Martin" <ve2dc@rac.ca>; Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 10:24:00 -0500; Not really. I used an inverted vee... apex at about 120', and had absolutely no trouble being heard in Europe... OTOH hearing was a problem that I did not resolve... no room for beverages. However fo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00021.html (7,248 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] 160m antennas (score: 1): Author: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 21:48:18 -0000; I commented off-reflector...but this is getting interesting, so forgive me for wading in, if this is obvious to you: 1) Make an inverted Ell using the tower. You can't decouple it..it'll have stray c; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00050.html (8,393 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m antennas (score: 1): Author: Phil - KB9CRY <kb9cry@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 17:19:47 -0600; And if I may add a comment: Jim Jarvis wrote: 6) revisit #3....somebody suggested an on-ground beverage. If your ground is actually 30' below the earth's surface, or 20, or 10, this might be a good s; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00058.html (7,822 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] 160M Antennas (score: 1): Author: Keith Hanson <ac9s@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 20:04:28 +0000; I have had success with a very simple 1/4 wave sloper fed from the top of the tower - braid to tower and center conductor to the antenna. I know it is inefficient because it is broad banded, but I wa; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00039.html (7,264 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] 160M Antennas (score: 1): Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 19:25:25 -0400; Since the tower itself is the other half of the antenna itself what you have is just found another way to feed the tower which does a significant portion of the actual radiation. Put in at least 16 r; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00045.html (10,128 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] 160M Antennas (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 07:03:10 -0800; Since the tower itself is the other half of the antenna itself what you have is just found another way to feed the tower which does a significant portion of the actual radiation. Put in at least 16 r; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00052.html (10,000 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]